Investigating the applicability of the evidence-based paradigm to software engineering

D. Budgen, S. Charters, M. Turner, P. Brereton, B. Kitchenham, S. Linkman
{"title":"Investigating the applicability of the evidence-based paradigm to software engineering","authors":"D. Budgen, S. Charters, M. Turner, P. Brereton, B. Kitchenham, S. Linkman","doi":"10.1145/1137661.1137665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The success of the evidence-based paradigm in other domains, especially medicine, has raised the question of how this might be employed in software engineering.Objectives: To report the research we are doing to evaluate problems associated with adopting the evidence-based paradigm in software engineering and identifying strategies to address these problems.Method: Currently the experimental paradigms used in a selected set of domains are being examined along with the experimental protocols that they employ. Our aim is to identify those domains that have generally similar characteristics to software engineering and to study the strategies that they employ to overcome the lack of rigorous empirical protocols. We are also undertaking a series of systematic literature reviews to identify the factors that may limit their applicability in the software engineering domain.Conclusions: We have identified two domains that experience problems with experimental protocols that are similar to those occurring for software engineering, and will investigate these further to assess whether the approaches used to aggregate evidence in these domains can be adapted for use in software engineering. Our experiences from performing systematic literature reviews are positive, but reveal infrastructure problems caused by poor indexing of the literature.","PeriodicalId":280017,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Interdisciplinary Software Engineering Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Interdisciplinary Software Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1137661.1137665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Context: The success of the evidence-based paradigm in other domains, especially medicine, has raised the question of how this might be employed in software engineering.Objectives: To report the research we are doing to evaluate problems associated with adopting the evidence-based paradigm in software engineering and identifying strategies to address these problems.Method: Currently the experimental paradigms used in a selected set of domains are being examined along with the experimental protocols that they employ. Our aim is to identify those domains that have generally similar characteristics to software engineering and to study the strategies that they employ to overcome the lack of rigorous empirical protocols. We are also undertaking a series of systematic literature reviews to identify the factors that may limit their applicability in the software engineering domain.Conclusions: We have identified two domains that experience problems with experimental protocols that are similar to those occurring for software engineering, and will investigate these further to assess whether the approaches used to aggregate evidence in these domains can be adapted for use in software engineering. Our experiences from performing systematic literature reviews are positive, but reveal infrastructure problems caused by poor indexing of the literature.
研究基于证据的范式在软件工程中的适用性
背景:循证范式在其他领域,尤其是医学领域的成功,提出了如何将其应用于软件工程的问题。目的:报告我们正在做的研究,以评估与在软件工程中采用循证范式相关的问题,并确定解决这些问题的策略。方法:目前,在选定的一组领域中使用的实验范式正在与它们使用的实验协议一起进行检查。我们的目标是识别那些与软件工程具有一般相似特征的领域,并研究它们用来克服缺乏严格的经验协议的策略。我们还进行了一系列系统的文献回顾,以确定可能限制它们在软件工程领域的适用性的因素。结论:我们已经确定了两个领域,它们在实验协议中遇到的问题与软件工程中出现的问题相似,并将进一步调查这些领域,以评估在这些领域中用于收集证据的方法是否可以适用于软件工程。我们进行系统文献综述的经验是积极的,但也揭示了文献索引不佳导致的基础设施问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信