ANALISIS ESTIMASI KEMAMPUAN SISWA DENGAN PENDEKATAN ITEM RESPONSE THEORY PENSKORAN DIKOTOMUS DAN POLITOMUS

Duden Sepuzaman, Edi Istiyono, Haryanto, Heri Retnawati, Yustiandi
{"title":"ANALISIS ESTIMASI KEMAMPUAN SISWA DENGAN PENDEKATAN ITEM RESPONSE THEORY PENSKORAN DIKOTOMUS DAN POLITOMUS","authors":"Duden Sepuzaman, Edi Istiyono, Haryanto, Heri Retnawati, Yustiandi","doi":"10.46918/karst.v4i1.948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares students' abilities using the Item Response Theory (IRT) approach to dichotomous and polytomous scoring. This research is quantitative descriptive. The research subjects were 1175 high school students in class XI spread across West Java and Banten provinces, consisting of 450 male students and 725 female students. Response data with dichotomous scoring were analyzed using the item response theory approach with the BILOG-MG program, while the polytomous scoring was analyzed using the GPCM approach using the R program. The results of the model fit test showed that the items most fit with the 2PL model. The instrument used is a work and energy material test instrument tested for validity d, reliability, distinguishing power, and difficulty level. The results showed that the average ability with a polytomous score was greater than that of a dichotomous, even though compared to having almost the same ability but with a relatively different distribution. The distribution of students' abilities with polytomous scoring is closer to the normal curve than the dichotomous scoring. The relationship between students' ability scores with these two scoring approaches is shown by a correlation coefficient score of 0.990 and a determination index of 0.9808 with a prediction line y= 0.9735 x +0.0036.","PeriodicalId":208060,"journal":{"name":"Karst : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN FISIKA DAN TERAPANNYA","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karst : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN FISIKA DAN TERAPANNYA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46918/karst.v4i1.948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study compares students' abilities using the Item Response Theory (IRT) approach to dichotomous and polytomous scoring. This research is quantitative descriptive. The research subjects were 1175 high school students in class XI spread across West Java and Banten provinces, consisting of 450 male students and 725 female students. Response data with dichotomous scoring were analyzed using the item response theory approach with the BILOG-MG program, while the polytomous scoring was analyzed using the GPCM approach using the R program. The results of the model fit test showed that the items most fit with the 2PL model. The instrument used is a work and energy material test instrument tested for validity d, reliability, distinguishing power, and difficulty level. The results showed that the average ability with a polytomous score was greater than that of a dichotomous, even though compared to having almost the same ability but with a relatively different distribution. The distribution of students' abilities with polytomous scoring is closer to the normal curve than the dichotomous scoring. The relationship between students' ability scores with these two scoring approaches is shown by a correlation coefficient score of 0.990 and a determination index of 0.9808 with a prediction line y= 0.9735 x +0.0036.
本研究比较了学生使用项目反应理论(IRT)方法进行二分式和多分式评分的能力。这项研究是定量描述性的。研究对象为分布在西爪哇省和万丹省的1175名高中11年级学生,其中男生450名,女生725名。采用项目反应理论方法,采用BILOG-MG程序对二分类评分进行分析;采用GPCM方法,采用R程序对多分类评分进行分析。模型拟合检验结果显示,项目最符合2PL模型。本仪器为功能材料测试仪器,经过了效度、信度、分辨能力、难度等测试。结果表明,即使与具有几乎相同的能力但分布相对不同的能力相比,具有多分式得分的平均能力大于具有二分式得分的平均能力。多分计分比二分计分更接近于正态曲线。学生能力得分与两种评分方法的关系为相关系数得分为0.990,决定指数为0.9808,预测线y= 0.9735 x +0.0036。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信