“Yeah, but I’m Shy!”: Classroom Participation as a Social Justice Issue

R. Diangelo, Özlem Sensoy
{"title":"“Yeah, but I’m Shy!”: Classroom Participation as a Social Justice Issue","authors":"R. Diangelo, Özlem Sensoy","doi":"10.1515/MLT-2018-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In-class participation is a common component of many university students’ course grade, yet there has been some debate over whether it is fair to grade participation, given that some students are “ naturally” introverted. In this paper, we problematize the central assumption that the arguments against grading participation rest upon: that classrooms are neutral spaces into which a range of personalities come together, each with unique needs that should be recognized and supported. As educators whose work and teaching is grounded in critical social justice frameworks, we argue that there is a fundamental dynamic that is missed when silence is presumed to be a-political. We argue that classrooms are microcosms of the wider society and as such, are political spaces in which dynamics of unequal social power also play out; there is no neutral classroom or natural mode of engagement. In this paper, we lay out the foundation of a social justice approach to teaching and problematize the notion of neutral classroom spaces. We speak back to some of the most common arguments against grading classroom participation and in doing so argue that participation in classroom settings is a central element to dismantling social injustice in our wider communities.","PeriodicalId":133504,"journal":{"name":"Multicultural Learning and Teaching","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multicultural Learning and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/MLT-2018-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract In-class participation is a common component of many university students’ course grade, yet there has been some debate over whether it is fair to grade participation, given that some students are “ naturally” introverted. In this paper, we problematize the central assumption that the arguments against grading participation rest upon: that classrooms are neutral spaces into which a range of personalities come together, each with unique needs that should be recognized and supported. As educators whose work and teaching is grounded in critical social justice frameworks, we argue that there is a fundamental dynamic that is missed when silence is presumed to be a-political. We argue that classrooms are microcosms of the wider society and as such, are political spaces in which dynamics of unequal social power also play out; there is no neutral classroom or natural mode of engagement. In this paper, we lay out the foundation of a social justice approach to teaching and problematize the notion of neutral classroom spaces. We speak back to some of the most common arguments against grading classroom participation and in doing so argue that participation in classroom settings is a central element to dismantling social injustice in our wider communities.
“是的,但是我很害羞!”:课堂参与作为一个社会正义问题
课堂参与度是许多大学生课程评分的一个共同组成部分,但鉴于一些学生“天生”内向,对课堂参与度评分是否公平一直存在争议。在本文中,我们对反对评分参与的核心假设提出了质疑:教室是中性的空间,各种个性聚集在一起,每个人都有独特的需求,应该得到认可和支持。作为教育工作者,他们的工作和教学是建立在关键的社会正义框架基础上的,我们认为,当沉默被假定为非政治时,遗漏了一个基本的动态。我们认为,教室是更广泛社会的缩影,因此,是政治空间,其中不平等的社会权力动态也在发挥作用;没有中立的教室或自然的参与模式。在本文中,我们提出了社会公正教学方法的基础,并对中性课堂空间的概念提出了问题。我们回顾了一些最常见的反对课堂参与评分的论点,并在此过程中提出,课堂参与是在我们更广泛的社区中消除社会不公正的核心因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信