Neomercantilist War: the US military and Middle East oil (1980–2003)

A. Mahdi
{"title":"Neomercantilist War: the US military and Middle East oil (1980–2003)","authors":"A. Mahdi","doi":"10.1108/reps-07-2021-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to argue that the Global Political Economy (GPE) theory of neomercantilism provides a sound explanation to the American military involvement in the Persian Gulf. Accordingly, this paper also proposes the concept of “Neomercantilist War” which analyses the use of military force to protect a strategically vital economic resource (such as Gulf oil). Neomercantilist War is a point of similarity between the GPE school of neomercantilism and the International Relations (IR) school of realism.Design/methodology/approachThe 1991 Gulf War and the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 are two major events of American military involvement to protect and/or seize Gulf oil. These two events will be tested for neomercantilism, in addition to the concept of “Neomercantilist War” as presented in the paper. The first feature, or definitional component, of neomercantilism is the major role of the state, the second is the preponderance of security/geopolitical goals over economic goals and the third is the zero-sum, relative gains mentality to dealing between states IR.FindingsThe GPE school of neomercantilism and the concept of Neomercantilist War do offer a sound explanation of American military involvement in the Gulf.Originality/valueThe American military involvement in the Gulf region has been analysed using the IR schools of realism and liberalism, but never using GPE theory. Even though GPE is mostly concerned with economic activity, the scope of GPE should be expanded to include military policies if they affect economic resources and activity.","PeriodicalId":423562,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economics and Political Science","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economics and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/reps-07-2021-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to argue that the Global Political Economy (GPE) theory of neomercantilism provides a sound explanation to the American military involvement in the Persian Gulf. Accordingly, this paper also proposes the concept of “Neomercantilist War” which analyses the use of military force to protect a strategically vital economic resource (such as Gulf oil). Neomercantilist War is a point of similarity between the GPE school of neomercantilism and the International Relations (IR) school of realism.Design/methodology/approachThe 1991 Gulf War and the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 are two major events of American military involvement to protect and/or seize Gulf oil. These two events will be tested for neomercantilism, in addition to the concept of “Neomercantilist War” as presented in the paper. The first feature, or definitional component, of neomercantilism is the major role of the state, the second is the preponderance of security/geopolitical goals over economic goals and the third is the zero-sum, relative gains mentality to dealing between states IR.FindingsThe GPE school of neomercantilism and the concept of Neomercantilist War do offer a sound explanation of American military involvement in the Gulf.Originality/valueThe American military involvement in the Gulf region has been analysed using the IR schools of realism and liberalism, but never using GPE theory. Even though GPE is mostly concerned with economic activity, the scope of GPE should be expanded to include military policies if they affect economic resources and activity.
新重商主义战争:美军与中东石油(1980-2003)
本文旨在论证新重商主义的全球政治经济学(GPE)理论为美国军事介入波斯湾提供了合理的解释。因此,本文还提出了“新重商主义战争”的概念,该概念分析了使用军事力量来保护具有战略意义的重要经济资源(如海湾石油)。新重商主义战争是GPE新重商主义学派与现实主义国际关系学派之间的一个相似点。设计/方法/途径1991年海湾战争和2003年美国入侵伊拉克是美国军事介入保护和/或夺取海湾石油的两大事件。除了本文提出的“新重商主义战争”概念外,这两个事件将对新重商主义进行测试。新重商主义的第一个特征或定义组成部分是国家的主要作用,第二个是安全/地缘政治目标优于经济目标,第三个是零和和相对收益的心态处理国家间的关系。GPE学派的新重商主义和新重商主义战争的概念确实为美国在海湾的军事介入提供了一个合理的解释。独创性/价值美国在海湾地区的军事介入一直是用现实主义和自由主义的国际关系学派来分析的,但从未使用过GPE理论。尽管GPE主要关注经济活动,但如果军事政策影响经济资源和活动,GPE的范围应扩大到包括军事政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信