Dependency Graph Approach for Multiprocessor Real-Time Synchronization

Jian-Jia Chen, G. V. D. Brüggen, Junjie Shi, Niklas Ueter
{"title":"Dependency Graph Approach for Multiprocessor Real-Time Synchronization","authors":"Jian-Jia Chen, G. V. D. Brüggen, Junjie Shi, Niklas Ueter","doi":"10.1109/RTSS.2018.00057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, many multiprocessor locking protocols have been designed and analyzed. However, the performance of these protocols highly depends on how the tasks are partitioned and prioritized, and how the resources are shared locally and globally. This paper answers a few fundamental questions when real-time tasks share resources in multiprocessor systems. We explore the fundamental difficulty of the multiprocessor synchronization problem and show that a very simplified version of this problem is NP-hard in the strong sense regardless of the number of processors and the underlying scheduling paradigm. Therefore, the allowance of preemption or migration does not reduce the computational complexity. On the positive side, we develop a dependency-graph approach that is specifically useful for frame-based real-time tasks, i.e., when all tasks have the same period and release their jobs always at the same time. We present a series of algorithms with speedup factors between 2 and 3 under semi-partitioned scheduling. We further explore methodologies for and tradeoffs between preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling algorithms, and partitioned and semi-partitioned scheduling algorithms. Our approach is extended to periodic tasks under certain conditions.","PeriodicalId":294784,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTSS.2018.00057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Over the years, many multiprocessor locking protocols have been designed and analyzed. However, the performance of these protocols highly depends on how the tasks are partitioned and prioritized, and how the resources are shared locally and globally. This paper answers a few fundamental questions when real-time tasks share resources in multiprocessor systems. We explore the fundamental difficulty of the multiprocessor synchronization problem and show that a very simplified version of this problem is NP-hard in the strong sense regardless of the number of processors and the underlying scheduling paradigm. Therefore, the allowance of preemption or migration does not reduce the computational complexity. On the positive side, we develop a dependency-graph approach that is specifically useful for frame-based real-time tasks, i.e., when all tasks have the same period and release their jobs always at the same time. We present a series of algorithms with speedup factors between 2 and 3 under semi-partitioned scheduling. We further explore methodologies for and tradeoffs between preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling algorithms, and partitioned and semi-partitioned scheduling algorithms. Our approach is extended to periodic tasks under certain conditions.
多处理器实时同步的依赖图方法
多年来,人们设计和分析了许多多处理器锁定协议。然而,这些协议的性能在很大程度上取决于任务如何划分和优先级,以及资源如何在本地和全局共享。本文回答了多处理器系统中实时任务共享资源的几个基本问题。我们探讨了多处理器同步问题的基本困难,并表明这个问题的一个非常简化的版本在强意义上是np困难的,无论处理器的数量和底层调度范式如何。因此,允许抢占或迁移并不会降低计算复杂度。从积极的方面来看,我们开发了一种依赖图方法,它对基于框架的实时任务特别有用,即当所有任务具有相同的时间段并且总是在同一时间释放它们的作业时。在半分区调度下,提出了一系列加速因子在2 ~ 3之间的算法。我们进一步探讨了抢占式和非抢占式调度算法、分区式和半分区式调度算法之间的方法和权衡。我们的方法可以扩展到某些条件下的周期性任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信