Records of fish kills in inland waters of NSW and Queensland in relation to cotton pesticides

G. Napier, P. Fairweather, A. C. Scott
{"title":"Records of fish kills in inland waters of NSW and Queensland in relation to cotton pesticides","authors":"G. Napier, P. Fairweather, A. C. Scott","doi":"10.31646/WA.222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fish kills are highly visible events and media publicity of them is powerful in developing the perception that our rivers are highly degraded through the impact of pesticides or other human insults. Ecotoxicology data derived from laboratory experiments suggests that fish, compared with other aquatic species, are relatively sensitive to pesticides used extensively in cotton cultivation. For example, the organochlorine endosulfan yielded 96-hrLC50s ranging from about 0.1µg/L for European carp to 0.2-2.4µg/L for native species. However, there is anecdotal evidence that fish and other aquatic life are healthy in cotton tailwaters likely to be contaminated. We review database of fish kills in northern NSW and southern Queensland kept by state governments, and report of fish kill frequencies in different river basins, their presumed or suspected causes, the species involved, and whether and which, pesticides were detected in each incident. These databases showed that fish kills were reported more often from cotton-growing areas and during cotton-growing season. More than half the 98 recorded fish kills were associated with pesticides by the investigators. However, many of the records gave only circumstantial evidence as to their cause, and only a few were actually investigated in detail. This makes it difficult to make a proper assessment of how pesticides may be implicated in fish kills or of the impact, more generally, that cotton pesticides are having on fish populations. We also present data on residues of endosulfan found in live fish near a lagoon near Wee Waa before and shortly after a fish kill. We conclude that simply measuring tissue concentrations of pesticide residues does not provide direct proof that a fish died from any pesticides detected. Overall we suggest that more careful scientific attention needs to be paid to and fish kills occurring in irrigation areas before we can know the real extent of damage from pesticides and therefore what management is needed","PeriodicalId":197128,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands Australia Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands Australia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31646/WA.222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Fish kills are highly visible events and media publicity of them is powerful in developing the perception that our rivers are highly degraded through the impact of pesticides or other human insults. Ecotoxicology data derived from laboratory experiments suggests that fish, compared with other aquatic species, are relatively sensitive to pesticides used extensively in cotton cultivation. For example, the organochlorine endosulfan yielded 96-hrLC50s ranging from about 0.1µg/L for European carp to 0.2-2.4µg/L for native species. However, there is anecdotal evidence that fish and other aquatic life are healthy in cotton tailwaters likely to be contaminated. We review database of fish kills in northern NSW and southern Queensland kept by state governments, and report of fish kill frequencies in different river basins, their presumed or suspected causes, the species involved, and whether and which, pesticides were detected in each incident. These databases showed that fish kills were reported more often from cotton-growing areas and during cotton-growing season. More than half the 98 recorded fish kills were associated with pesticides by the investigators. However, many of the records gave only circumstantial evidence as to their cause, and only a few were actually investigated in detail. This makes it difficult to make a proper assessment of how pesticides may be implicated in fish kills or of the impact, more generally, that cotton pesticides are having on fish populations. We also present data on residues of endosulfan found in live fish near a lagoon near Wee Waa before and shortly after a fish kill. We conclude that simply measuring tissue concentrations of pesticide residues does not provide direct proof that a fish died from any pesticides detected. Overall we suggest that more careful scientific attention needs to be paid to and fish kills occurring in irrigation areas before we can know the real extent of damage from pesticides and therefore what management is needed
新南威尔士州和昆士兰州内陆水域与棉花农药有关的鱼类死亡记录
鱼类死亡是非常明显的事件,媒体对它们的宣传有力地使人们认识到,我们的河流由于杀虫剂或其他人类侮辱的影响而严重退化。来自实验室实验的生态毒理学数据表明,与其他水生物种相比,鱼类对棉花种植中广泛使用的农药相对敏感。例如,有机氯硫丹产生96- hrlc50,范围从欧洲鲤鱼的约0.1µg/L到本地鲤鱼的0.2-2.4µg/L。然而,有轶事证据表明,在可能受到污染的棉花尾水中,鱼类和其他水生生物是健康的。我们回顾了州政府保存的新南威尔士州北部和昆士兰州南部的鱼类死亡数据库,并报告了不同流域的鱼类死亡频率,其假定或怀疑的原因,所涉及的物种,以及每次事件中是否检测到农药。这些数据库显示,在棉花种植区和棉花生长季节,鱼类死亡的报告更为频繁。调查人员发现,在记录在案的98起鱼类死亡事件中,有一半以上与杀虫剂有关。然而,许多记录只提供了有关其原因的间接证据,只有少数记录得到了真正的详细调查。这使得人们很难对杀虫剂与鱼类死亡之间的关系或对棉花杀虫剂对鱼类种群的影响做出适当的评估。我们还提供了有关在Wee Waa附近的一个泻湖附近的活鱼在鱼死亡之前和之后不久发现的硫丹残留物的数据。我们的结论是,简单地测量组织中农药残留的浓度并不能直接证明鱼死于检测到的任何农药。总的来说,我们建议,在我们了解农药损害的真实程度以及需要采取何种管理措施之前,需要对灌区发生的鱼类死亡和鱼类死亡给予更仔细的科学关注
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信