Multi-objective design of highly interpretable fuzzy rule-based classifiers with semantic cointension

Raffaele Cannone, J. M. Alonso, L. Magdalena
{"title":"Multi-objective design of highly interpretable fuzzy rule-based classifiers with semantic cointension","authors":"Raffaele Cannone, J. M. Alonso, L. Magdalena","doi":"10.1109/GEFS.2011.5949502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although recently there has been many papers dealing with how to characterize and assess interpretability, there is still a lot of work to be done. Interpretability assessment is usually addressed by evaluating the complexity and/or readability of fuzzy rule-based systems. However, comprehensibility is usually not taken into account because it implies more cognitive aspects which are difficult to formalize and to deal with. In this work we show the importance of considering not only readability but also comprehensibility during the design process of fuzzy systems. We introduce the use of a novel index for evaluating comprehensibility in the context of a three-objective evolutionary framework for designing highly interpretable fuzzy rule-based classifiers. It is named as logical view index (LVI) and it is based on a semantic cointension approach. The proposed evolutionary algorithm consists of embedding the HILK (Highly Interpretable Linguistic Knowledge) fuzzy modeling methodology into the classical NSGA-II with the aim of maximizing accuracy, readability, and comprehensibility of the generated fuzzy rule-based classifiers. Our proposal is tested in the well-known PIMA benchmark problem which corresponds to a medical diagnosis problem where interpretability is a strong requirement.","PeriodicalId":120918,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 5th International Workshop on Genetic and Evolutionary Fuzzy Systems (GEFS)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 5th International Workshop on Genetic and Evolutionary Fuzzy Systems (GEFS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GEFS.2011.5949502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Although recently there has been many papers dealing with how to characterize and assess interpretability, there is still a lot of work to be done. Interpretability assessment is usually addressed by evaluating the complexity and/or readability of fuzzy rule-based systems. However, comprehensibility is usually not taken into account because it implies more cognitive aspects which are difficult to formalize and to deal with. In this work we show the importance of considering not only readability but also comprehensibility during the design process of fuzzy systems. We introduce the use of a novel index for evaluating comprehensibility in the context of a three-objective evolutionary framework for designing highly interpretable fuzzy rule-based classifiers. It is named as logical view index (LVI) and it is based on a semantic cointension approach. The proposed evolutionary algorithm consists of embedding the HILK (Highly Interpretable Linguistic Knowledge) fuzzy modeling methodology into the classical NSGA-II with the aim of maximizing accuracy, readability, and comprehensibility of the generated fuzzy rule-based classifiers. Our proposal is tested in the well-known PIMA benchmark problem which corresponds to a medical diagnosis problem where interpretability is a strong requirement.
具有语义内涵的高可解释模糊规则分类器的多目标设计
虽然最近有许多论文讨论如何描述和评估可解释性,但仍有许多工作要做。可解释性评估通常通过评估基于模糊规则的系统的复杂性和/或可读性来解决。然而,可理解性通常不被考虑在内,因为它意味着更多难以形式化和处理的认知方面。在这项工作中,我们表明了在模糊系统的设计过程中不仅要考虑可读性,还要考虑可理解性的重要性。在设计高度可解释的模糊规则分类器的三目标进化框架中,我们引入了一种新的评价可理解性的指标。它被命名为逻辑视图索引(LVI),并基于语义内涵方法。提出的进化算法包括将HILK(高度可解释语言知识)模糊建模方法嵌入到经典的NSGA-II中,目的是最大限度地提高生成的基于规则的模糊分类器的准确性、可读性和可理解性。我们的建议在著名的PIMA基准问题中进行了测试,该基准问题对应于对可解释性有很强要求的医疗诊断问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信