Experimental assessment of wireless coexistence for 802.15.4 in the presence of 802.11g/n

N. LaSorte, Samer A. Rajab, H. Refai
{"title":"Experimental assessment of wireless coexistence for 802.15.4 in the presence of 802.11g/n","authors":"N. LaSorte, Samer A. Rajab, H. Refai","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.2012.6351685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wireless coexistence is a growing concern, given the ubiquity of wireless technology. Although IEEE Standards have started to address this problem in an analytical framework, a standard experimental setup and process to evaluate wireless coexistence is lacking. Literature that reports experimental assessment of wireless coexistence places little emphasis on separation distance of wireless nodes under test or the spectrum occupancy of the interfering network, making comparisons difficult. This paper provides an extensive literature survey of 802.15.4 and 802.11 b/g/n wireless coexistence and demonstrates that in a higher wireless channel occupancy environment, ZigBee coexists with 802.11n better than with 802.11g. A reproducible, versatile, and practical test setup is presented to serve as a starting point toward establishing standard practice for wireless coexistence testing of wireless systems in general and wireless medical devices in particular. Experimental evaluations demonstrated consistency with results reported in the literature.","PeriodicalId":197346,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2012.6351685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Wireless coexistence is a growing concern, given the ubiquity of wireless technology. Although IEEE Standards have started to address this problem in an analytical framework, a standard experimental setup and process to evaluate wireless coexistence is lacking. Literature that reports experimental assessment of wireless coexistence places little emphasis on separation distance of wireless nodes under test or the spectrum occupancy of the interfering network, making comparisons difficult. This paper provides an extensive literature survey of 802.15.4 and 802.11 b/g/n wireless coexistence and demonstrates that in a higher wireless channel occupancy environment, ZigBee coexists with 802.11n better than with 802.11g. A reproducible, versatile, and practical test setup is presented to serve as a starting point toward establishing standard practice for wireless coexistence testing of wireless systems in general and wireless medical devices in particular. Experimental evaluations demonstrated consistency with results reported in the literature.
802.11g/n存在下802.15.4无线共存的实验评估
由于无线技术的普及,无线共存问题日益受到关注。虽然IEEE标准已经开始在一个分析框架中解决这个问题,但缺乏一个标准的实验设置和过程来评估无线共存。报道无线共存实验评估的文献很少强调被测无线节点的分离距离或干扰网络的频谱占用,使得比较困难。本文对802.15.4和802.11 b/g/n无线共存进行了广泛的文献综述,并论证了在更高的无线信道占用环境下,ZigBee与802.11n的共存优于与802.11g的共存。提出了一种可重复的、通用的和实用的测试设置,作为建立一般无线系统和特别是无线医疗设备的无线共存测试的标准实践的起点。实验评价与文献报道的结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信