{"title":"Creating Art in a Critical Research and Writing Course","authors":"Kate Hanzalik","doi":"10.37514/dbh-j.2019.7.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Key Questions in the Art-Based Writing Movement Is there a place for artistic creation in a required writing course that emphasizes critical thinking and research? A necessary starting point to answer that question for the purpose of this report is another question: What is the nature of critical thinking? Three perspectives inform the response: the Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing (Framework; Council of Writing Program Administrators [CWPA], National Council of Teachers of English, & National Writing Project, 2011); the WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition 3.0 (Statement; CWPA, 2014), which is applicable to required general education writing courses; and that of those beyond writing studies: educators and practitioners in the fields of art and design. According to the Framework, critical thinking is “the ability to analyze a situation or text and make thoughtful decisions based on that.” By “writ[ing] about familiar or unfamiliar texts [and] examining assumptions about the text held by different audiences,” students can “think through ideas, problems, and issues; identify and challenge assumptions; and explore multiple ways of understanding” (CWPA et al., 2011, p. 7). The Framework offers a comprehensive list of indicators of, and strategies for, critical thinking:","PeriodicalId":404723,"journal":{"name":"Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/dbh-j.2019.7.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Key Questions in the Art-Based Writing Movement Is there a place for artistic creation in a required writing course that emphasizes critical thinking and research? A necessary starting point to answer that question for the purpose of this report is another question: What is the nature of critical thinking? Three perspectives inform the response: the Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing (Framework; Council of Writing Program Administrators [CWPA], National Council of Teachers of English, & National Writing Project, 2011); the WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition 3.0 (Statement; CWPA, 2014), which is applicable to required general education writing courses; and that of those beyond writing studies: educators and practitioners in the fields of art and design. According to the Framework, critical thinking is “the ability to analyze a situation or text and make thoughtful decisions based on that.” By “writ[ing] about familiar or unfamiliar texts [and] examining assumptions about the text held by different audiences,” students can “think through ideas, problems, and issues; identify and challenge assumptions; and explore multiple ways of understanding” (CWPA et al., 2011, p. 7). The Framework offers a comprehensive list of indicators of, and strategies for, critical thinking:
在强调批判性思维和研究的必修写作课程中,艺术创作是否有一席之地?为了本报告的目的,回答这个问题的一个必要的起点是另一个问题:批判性思维的本质是什么?三个视角为回应提供了依据:中学后写作成功的框架(框架;全国英语教师委员会,全国写作项目委员会,2011年);WPA第一年作文3.0成果声明(声明;CWPA, 2014),适用于通识教育写作必修课程;以及那些超越写作研究的人:艺术和设计领域的教育者和实践者。根据该框架,批判性思维是“分析情况或文本并在此基础上做出深思熟虑决定的能力”。通过“写熟悉或不熟悉的文本,并检查不同读者对文本的假设”,学生可以“思考思想、问题和议题;识别和挑战假设;并探索多种理解方式”(CWPA et al., 2011, p. 7)。该框架提供了批判性思维指标和策略的综合列表: