Epistemological Anarchism Meets Epistemic Voluntarism

M. Kusch
{"title":"Epistemological Anarchism Meets Epistemic Voluntarism","authors":"M. Kusch","doi":"10.1017/9781108575102.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I shall compare and contrast central themes of Paul Feyerabend’s bestknown work, Against Method (1975, subsequently “AM”) with pivotal ideas of Bas van Fraassen’s 2002 book, The Empirical Stance (subsequently “ES”). The comparison appears fruitful for two reasons: first, because van Fraassen is one of the few contemporary philosophers of science who continue to engage closely and charitably with Feyerabend’s work; and, second, because van Fraassen disagrees with some of Feyerabend’s central contentions. I do not here have the space to determine conclusively who of the two philosophers is right where they take different views on a given question; I shall be satisfied to clearly identify the issues and disputes that need further reflection.","PeriodicalId":334687,"journal":{"name":"Interpreting Feyerabend","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interpreting Feyerabend","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108575102.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper I shall compare and contrast central themes of Paul Feyerabend’s bestknown work, Against Method (1975, subsequently “AM”) with pivotal ideas of Bas van Fraassen’s 2002 book, The Empirical Stance (subsequently “ES”). The comparison appears fruitful for two reasons: first, because van Fraassen is one of the few contemporary philosophers of science who continue to engage closely and charitably with Feyerabend’s work; and, second, because van Fraassen disagrees with some of Feyerabend’s central contentions. I do not here have the space to determine conclusively who of the two philosophers is right where they take different views on a given question; I shall be satisfied to clearly identify the issues and disputes that need further reflection.
认识论无政府主义遇到认识论唯意志主义
在本文中,我将比较和对比保罗·费耶阿本德最著名的作品《反对方法》(1975年,后来的《AM》)的中心主题与巴斯·范·弗拉森2002年的书《经验立场》(后来的《ES》)的关键思想。这种比较似乎有两个原因:第一,因为范·弗拉森是当代少数几个继续密切而慷慨地参与费耶阿本德工作的科学哲学家之一;第二,因为范·弗拉森不同意费耶阿本德的一些核心观点。在这里,我没有足够的空间来确定两位哲学家在他们对给定问题的不同观点上谁是正确的;我将满意地清楚地指出需要进一步思考的问题和争端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信