A new Data-Driven Approach for Comparative Assessment of Baseline Load Profiles Supporting the Planning of Future Charging Infrastructure

Johannes Galenzowski, Simon Waczowicz, V. Hagenmeyer
{"title":"A new Data-Driven Approach for Comparative Assessment of Baseline Load Profiles Supporting the Planning of Future Charging Infrastructure","authors":"Johannes Galenzowski, Simon Waczowicz, V. Hagenmeyer","doi":"10.1145/3599733.3600245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to achieve the worldwide set ambitious climate goals, the identification and characterization of flexibility in city districts can reduce grid loads and avoid grid congestion. Unlike other flexibility indicators in the literature, the present paper introduces a new flexibility indicator that uses a data-driven approach to determine flexibility from actual measured load profiles. We present this new indicator by considering flexibility in the context of planning charging infrastructure with a valley filling approach. For this use case, we introduce a data-analysis workflow to apply the presented flexibility indicator. The described data-analysis workflow is applied to data from a real-world city district. Based on the results from the real-world data, we show that the highest peak load and the least flexible peak are not always identical. Therefore, it is not sufficient to consider only the highest peak loads to adequately describe flexibility. Furthermore, we discuss that additional flexibility can be used as another degree of freedom to optimize the charging power or the charging duration. In the presented real-world data, we show that the maximum required charging power is determined by the most inflexible peak and can be the same or smaller for all peaks with a higher flexibility. Moreover, we highlight the difference between considering buildings individually and combining them as a district.","PeriodicalId":114998,"journal":{"name":"Companion Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Companion Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3599733.3600245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In order to achieve the worldwide set ambitious climate goals, the identification and characterization of flexibility in city districts can reduce grid loads and avoid grid congestion. Unlike other flexibility indicators in the literature, the present paper introduces a new flexibility indicator that uses a data-driven approach to determine flexibility from actual measured load profiles. We present this new indicator by considering flexibility in the context of planning charging infrastructure with a valley filling approach. For this use case, we introduce a data-analysis workflow to apply the presented flexibility indicator. The described data-analysis workflow is applied to data from a real-world city district. Based on the results from the real-world data, we show that the highest peak load and the least flexible peak are not always identical. Therefore, it is not sufficient to consider only the highest peak loads to adequately describe flexibility. Furthermore, we discuss that additional flexibility can be used as another degree of freedom to optimize the charging power or the charging duration. In the presented real-world data, we show that the maximum required charging power is determined by the most inflexible peak and can be the same or smaller for all peaks with a higher flexibility. Moreover, we highlight the difference between considering buildings individually and combining them as a district.
支持未来充电基础设施规划的基线负荷概况比较评估的新数据驱动方法
为了实现世界范围内设定的雄心勃勃的气候目标,城市区域灵活性的识别和表征可以减少电网负荷并避免电网拥堵。与文献中的其他灵活性指标不同,本文引入了一种新的灵活性指标,该指标使用数据驱动的方法从实际测量的负载概况中确定灵活性。我们提出了这一新的指标,通过考虑在规划充电基础设施的情况下的灵活性与山谷填充方法。对于这个用例,我们引入一个数据分析工作流来应用所提供的灵活性指标。所描述的数据分析工作流应用于来自真实城市区域的数据。根据实际数据的结果,我们发现最高峰值负载和最不灵活的峰值并不总是相同的。因此,仅考虑最高峰值负荷是不足以充分描述灵活性的。此外,我们还讨论了额外的灵活性可以作为另一个自由度来优化充电功率或充电持续时间。在给出的实际数据中,我们表明,所需的最大充电功率由最不灵活的峰值决定,并且对于具有更高灵活性的所有峰值可以相同或更小。此外,我们强调了单独考虑建筑和将它们组合成一个区域之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信