Difficult relationships: how will compulsory School History and an Ubuntu-based curriculum help nation-building in South Africa?

R. Nussey
{"title":"Difficult relationships: how will compulsory School History and an Ubuntu-based curriculum help nation-building in South Africa?","authors":"R. Nussey","doi":"10.17159/2223-0386/2018/N19A1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite South Africa’s shift to democracy, there are ongoing difficulties in relationships both in the broader society and schools. An official response to this situation was the establishment of the History Ministerial Task Team (MTT), which recommended: that history should be made a compulsory subject for learners in all phases at school; and, that the history curriculum should be revised using an African nationalist paradigm, informed by the framework of Ubuntu. This article uses the findings of a research project conducted in history classrooms at three primary schools in Johannesburg to illustrate some of the difficulties in relationships in the history classroom. It argues that compulsory history at school level will not necessarily be a panacea for South Africa’s social ills, especially as this proposal has reawakened fears of how history education was abused during apartheid. A strength of the History MTT’s report is that it emphasises the importance of multi-perspectives in history, while favouring an approach that uses an African nationalist paradigm, informed by Ubuntu, to assist with nation-building. However, the notion of Ubuntu needs to be reconstituted, and when applied in conjunction with reconciliation pedagogy, it provides an alternative way, during teacher development workshops, for in-service history teachers to reflect on their own residual prejudices about “the other”, so that, in turn, they are able to facilitate meaningful changes in relationships in the history classroom. This approach might be applicable not only in South Africa, but also to history teachers in post-conflict countries which experience similar problems.","PeriodicalId":190311,"journal":{"name":"Yesterday and Today","volume":"476 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yesterday and Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2223-0386/2018/N19A1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Despite South Africa’s shift to democracy, there are ongoing difficulties in relationships both in the broader society and schools. An official response to this situation was the establishment of the History Ministerial Task Team (MTT), which recommended: that history should be made a compulsory subject for learners in all phases at school; and, that the history curriculum should be revised using an African nationalist paradigm, informed by the framework of Ubuntu. This article uses the findings of a research project conducted in history classrooms at three primary schools in Johannesburg to illustrate some of the difficulties in relationships in the history classroom. It argues that compulsory history at school level will not necessarily be a panacea for South Africa’s social ills, especially as this proposal has reawakened fears of how history education was abused during apartheid. A strength of the History MTT’s report is that it emphasises the importance of multi-perspectives in history, while favouring an approach that uses an African nationalist paradigm, informed by Ubuntu, to assist with nation-building. However, the notion of Ubuntu needs to be reconstituted, and when applied in conjunction with reconciliation pedagogy, it provides an alternative way, during teacher development workshops, for in-service history teachers to reflect on their own residual prejudices about “the other”, so that, in turn, they are able to facilitate meaningful changes in relationships in the history classroom. This approach might be applicable not only in South Africa, but also to history teachers in post-conflict countries which experience similar problems.
困难的关系:强制性的学校历史和以优步为基础的课程将如何帮助南非的国家建设?
尽管南非已经转向民主,但在更广泛的社会和学校中,关系仍然存在困难。对这种情况的官方反应是成立了历史部长任务小组(MTT),该小组建议:历史应成为学校所有阶段学习者的必修科目;历史课程应该在乌班图的框架下,使用非洲民族主义范式进行修订。本文利用在约翰内斯堡三所小学的历史课堂上进行的一项研究项目的结果来说明历史课堂上人际关系的一些困难。它认为,学校必修的历史未必是解决南非社会弊病的灵丹妙药,尤其是这一提议再次唤醒了人们对种族隔离时期历史教育被滥用的担忧。历史MTT报告的一个优势在于,它强调了历史多角度的重要性,同时支持使用非洲民族主义范式的方法,以Ubuntu为基础,协助国家建设。然而,Ubuntu的概念需要重建,当与和解教学法结合使用时,它提供了另一种方式,在教师发展研讨会上,在职历史教师反思他们自己对“他者”的残余偏见,因此,反过来,他们能够促进历史课堂上关系的有意义的变化。这种方法可能不仅适用于南非,而且也适用于经历类似问题的冲突后国家的历史教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信