Comparison of Overset Mesh with Morphing Mesh: Flow Over a Forced Oscillating and Freely Oscillating 2D Cylinder

M. Alletto
{"title":"Comparison of Overset Mesh with Morphing Mesh: Flow Over a Forced Oscillating and Freely Oscillating 2D Cylinder","authors":"M. Alletto","doi":"10.51560/ofj.v2.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fluid structural interactions involve temporal change of the boundaries of the computational domain as a result of the fluid forces acting on the solid structure. In order to take into account this change, OpenFOAM offers two different methods: the overset method and the morphing mesh method. The morphing mesh method takes into account the boundary movement by changing the topology of the mesh but keeping the connectivity between cells unchanged. The overset methods consists in non overlapping meshes which are moving relative to a background mesh. Usually the meshes do not change the topology. The coupling between meshes is achieved by interpolation of the variables between the meshes. Both methods are compared with each other and reference experiments and simulation by taking a two-dimensional laminar flow around a cylinder. The results are found to agree reasonable well with the references. Both mesh types give similar results for similar number of cells.","PeriodicalId":252778,"journal":{"name":"OpenFOAM® Journal","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OpenFOAM® Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51560/ofj.v2.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Fluid structural interactions involve temporal change of the boundaries of the computational domain as a result of the fluid forces acting on the solid structure. In order to take into account this change, OpenFOAM offers two different methods: the overset method and the morphing mesh method. The morphing mesh method takes into account the boundary movement by changing the topology of the mesh but keeping the connectivity between cells unchanged. The overset methods consists in non overlapping meshes which are moving relative to a background mesh. Usually the meshes do not change the topology. The coupling between meshes is achieved by interpolation of the variables between the meshes. Both methods are compared with each other and reference experiments and simulation by taking a two-dimensional laminar flow around a cylinder. The results are found to agree reasonable well with the references. Both mesh types give similar results for similar number of cells.
偏移网格与变形网格的比较:强制振荡与自由振荡二维圆柱体上的流动
流体-结构相互作用涉及由于作用于固体结构上的流体力而导致计算域边界的时间变化。为了考虑到这种变化,OpenFOAM提供了两种不同的方法:overset方法和morphing mesh方法。变形网格法通过改变网格的拓扑结构来考虑边界移动,但保持单元之间的连通性不变。覆盖方法包括相对于背景网格移动的非重叠网格。通常网格不会改变拓扑结构。网格间的耦合是通过网格间变量的插值来实现的。对两种方法进行了比较,并以圆柱体周围二维层流为例进行了实验和仿真。计算结果与文献吻合较好。两种网格类型对于相似数量的细胞给出相似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信