[Regular Paper] Inference of Genetic Networks Using Random Forests: Use of Different Weights for Time-Series and Static Gene Expression Data

Shuhei Kimura, M. Tokuhisa, Mariko Okada
{"title":"[Regular Paper] Inference of Genetic Networks Using Random Forests: Use of Different Weights for Time-Series and Static Gene Expression Data","authors":"Shuhei Kimura, M. Tokuhisa, Mariko Okada","doi":"10.1109/BIBE.2018.00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genetic network inference methods using random forests have shown promise. Some of the random-forest-based inference methods have an ability to analyze both time-series and static gene expression data. We think however that, as the gene expression levels at two adjacent measurements of a time-series data are often similar to each other, the gene expression levels at each measurement in the time-series data are less informative than those in the static data. On the basis of this idea, we proposed a new inference method that relies more on static gene expression data than time-series ones. Through the numerical experiments, we showed that the quality of the inferred genetic network is slightly improved by giving greater importance to static data than time-series ones. Although we develop the new method by modifying the random-forest-based inference method proposed by the authors, we could introduce the idea in this study into any inference method that is capable of analyzing both time-series and static gene expression data.","PeriodicalId":127507,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE.2018.00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Genetic network inference methods using random forests have shown promise. Some of the random-forest-based inference methods have an ability to analyze both time-series and static gene expression data. We think however that, as the gene expression levels at two adjacent measurements of a time-series data are often similar to each other, the gene expression levels at each measurement in the time-series data are less informative than those in the static data. On the basis of this idea, we proposed a new inference method that relies more on static gene expression data than time-series ones. Through the numerical experiments, we showed that the quality of the inferred genetic network is slightly improved by giving greater importance to static data than time-series ones. Although we develop the new method by modifying the random-forest-based inference method proposed by the authors, we could introduce the idea in this study into any inference method that is capable of analyzing both time-series and static gene expression data.
使用随机森林的遗传网络推断:对时间序列和静态基因表达数据使用不同权重
利用随机森林的遗传网络推理方法已显示出良好的前景。一些基于随机森林的推理方法具有分析时间序列和静态基因表达数据的能力。然而,我们认为,由于时间序列数据的两个相邻测量值的基因表达水平通常彼此相似,因此时间序列数据中每个测量值的基因表达水平比静态数据中的基因表达水平提供的信息要少。在此基础上,我们提出了一种新的推理方法,该方法更多地依赖于静态基因表达数据而不是时间序列数据。通过数值实验,我们表明,通过对静态数据的重视程度高于对时间序列数据的重视程度,推导出的遗传网络的质量略有提高。虽然我们通过修改作者提出的基于随机森林的推理方法来开发新方法,但我们可以将本研究中的思想引入任何能够分析时间序列和静态基因表达数据的推理方法中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信