The Future of Official Statistics

E. Groshen
{"title":"The Future of Official Statistics","authors":"E. Groshen","doi":"10.1162/99608f92.591917c6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Official statistics are a pure public good and a key element of our national data infrastructure. They support our well-being by informing a vast set of public and private decisions. Yet, today they stand at a crossroads in the United States. With new technologies, today’s official statistics could be more relevant, interoperable, granular, and timely. Recent experience during the pandemic clarifies the need for improvement. The agencies could tap the new wealth of non-survey data to accomplish these goals without increasing burdens on survey respondents. They could operate more in sync with each other (to facilitate combining and sharing data) and more independently from politics (to reinforce public trust in their integrity). They could be better protected from defunding and requirements to combine operations with non-statistical agencies. These changes are possible, but not without effort by the statistical system’s stakeholders. The agencies cannot do it alone. The alternative, I fear, is a downward spiral in official statistics. Current funding neglect and erosion of independence threaten to reduce public trust and data quality. Less reliable products would then lead to further cuts and lower response rates, and suppress quality further. Hence the spiral. To secure a promising future for official statistics and avoid the death spiral, the statistical system’s stakeholders must actively advocate changes that include data-sharing legislation, flexible and dependable funding, adopting common data schema, and a modernized, more coordinated statistical system. The statistical and data science communities—including you—have an important role to play in choosing the path ahead.","PeriodicalId":250931,"journal":{"name":"Issue 3.4, Fall 2021","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue 3.4, Fall 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.591917c6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Official statistics are a pure public good and a key element of our national data infrastructure. They support our well-being by informing a vast set of public and private decisions. Yet, today they stand at a crossroads in the United States. With new technologies, today’s official statistics could be more relevant, interoperable, granular, and timely. Recent experience during the pandemic clarifies the need for improvement. The agencies could tap the new wealth of non-survey data to accomplish these goals without increasing burdens on survey respondents. They could operate more in sync with each other (to facilitate combining and sharing data) and more independently from politics (to reinforce public trust in their integrity). They could be better protected from defunding and requirements to combine operations with non-statistical agencies. These changes are possible, but not without effort by the statistical system’s stakeholders. The agencies cannot do it alone. The alternative, I fear, is a downward spiral in official statistics. Current funding neglect and erosion of independence threaten to reduce public trust and data quality. Less reliable products would then lead to further cuts and lower response rates, and suppress quality further. Hence the spiral. To secure a promising future for official statistics and avoid the death spiral, the statistical system’s stakeholders must actively advocate changes that include data-sharing legislation, flexible and dependable funding, adopting common data schema, and a modernized, more coordinated statistical system. The statistical and data science communities—including you—have an important role to play in choosing the path ahead.
官方统计的未来
官方统计数据是一种纯粹的公共产品,是我们国家数据基础设施的关键要素。它们通过为大量公共和私人决策提供信息来支持我们的福祉。然而,今天他们站在美国的十字路口。有了新技术,今天的官方统计数据可能更相关、更可互操作、更精细、更及时。最近在大流行期间的经验表明需要改进。这些机构可以利用非调查数据的新财富来实现这些目标,而不会增加调查受访者的负担。它们可以彼此更加同步(以促进数据的整合和共享),也可以更加独立于政治(以加强公众对它们诚信的信任)。它们可以得到更好的保护,避免资金减少和需要将业务与非统计机构合并。这些变化是可能的,但没有统计系统利益相关者的努力是不可能的。这些机构无法单独做到这一点。我担心,另一种选择是官方统计数据的螺旋式下降。目前对资金的忽视和对独立性的侵蚀可能会降低公众的信任和数据质量。不可靠的产品将导致进一步的削减和更低的回复率,并进一步抑制质量。因此出现了螺旋式上升。为了确保官方统计的美好未来并避免死亡螺旋,统计系统的利益攸关方必须积极倡导变革,包括数据共享立法、灵活可靠的供资、采用通用数据模式以及现代化、更加协调的统计系统。统计和数据科学界——包括你在内——在选择未来的道路上扮演着重要的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信