Comparison of field oriented versus model predictive torque control techniques for monitoring interior PM traction motor over wide speed range

N. Adamopoulos, F. Karamountzou, A. Sarigiannidis, A. Kladas
{"title":"Comparison of field oriented versus model predictive torque control techniques for monitoring interior PM traction motor over wide speed range","authors":"N. Adamopoulos, F. Karamountzou, A. Sarigiannidis, A. Kladas","doi":"10.1109/DEMPED.2017.8062379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares two torque control methodologies, namely Field Oriented and Model Predictive ones, for monitoring Interior Permanent Magnet Motor (IPMM) over a wide speed range. IPMM magnetic saturation and cross coupling effects are taken into consideration, increasing significantly the precision of the developed controllers. Maximum Torque per Ampere (MTPA) and Field Weakening (FW) operating modes below and above the rated speed, respectively, are considered for an Electric Vehicle (EV) application. In the Field Oriented Control (FOC) case, this is achieved by implementing convenient Look-Up Tables (LUT) and PI controllers, while in the Model Predictive Control (MPC) case it is obtained via a particular cost function. Moreover, in the MPC case, an additional power loss tracking factor is introduced in the cost function, in order to minimize the total motor losses over the entire drive cycle. The proposed control techniques are evaluated under both steady state and dynamic conditions, illustrating the relative advantages of MPC in terms of robustness and dynamic behavior.","PeriodicalId":325413,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEMPED.2017.8062379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper compares two torque control methodologies, namely Field Oriented and Model Predictive ones, for monitoring Interior Permanent Magnet Motor (IPMM) over a wide speed range. IPMM magnetic saturation and cross coupling effects are taken into consideration, increasing significantly the precision of the developed controllers. Maximum Torque per Ampere (MTPA) and Field Weakening (FW) operating modes below and above the rated speed, respectively, are considered for an Electric Vehicle (EV) application. In the Field Oriented Control (FOC) case, this is achieved by implementing convenient Look-Up Tables (LUT) and PI controllers, while in the Model Predictive Control (MPC) case it is obtained via a particular cost function. Moreover, in the MPC case, an additional power loss tracking factor is introduced in the cost function, in order to minimize the total motor losses over the entire drive cycle. The proposed control techniques are evaluated under both steady state and dynamic conditions, illustrating the relative advantages of MPC in terms of robustness and dynamic behavior.
面向磁场与模型预测转矩控制技术在大转速范围内监测内部永磁牵引电机的比较
本文比较了两种转矩控制方法,即磁场定向和模型预测,用于监测内嵌式永磁电机(IPMM)的宽速度范围。考虑了IPMM磁饱和和交叉耦合效应,大大提高了控制器的精度。对于电动汽车(EV)来说,最大扭矩每安培(MTPA)和磁场减弱(FW)两种工作模式分别低于和高于额定速度。在面向现场的控制(FOC)情况下,这是通过实现方便的查找表(LUT)和PI控制器来实现的,而在模型预测控制(MPC)情况下,它是通过特定的成本函数获得的。此外,在MPC的情况下,在成本函数中引入了一个额外的功率损失跟踪因子,以便在整个驱动周期内最大限度地减少电机的总损耗。在稳态和动态条件下对所提出的控制技术进行了评估,说明了MPC在鲁棒性和动态行为方面的相对优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信