N. Adamopoulos, F. Karamountzou, A. Sarigiannidis, A. Kladas
{"title":"Comparison of field oriented versus model predictive torque control techniques for monitoring interior PM traction motor over wide speed range","authors":"N. Adamopoulos, F. Karamountzou, A. Sarigiannidis, A. Kladas","doi":"10.1109/DEMPED.2017.8062379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares two torque control methodologies, namely Field Oriented and Model Predictive ones, for monitoring Interior Permanent Magnet Motor (IPMM) over a wide speed range. IPMM magnetic saturation and cross coupling effects are taken into consideration, increasing significantly the precision of the developed controllers. Maximum Torque per Ampere (MTPA) and Field Weakening (FW) operating modes below and above the rated speed, respectively, are considered for an Electric Vehicle (EV) application. In the Field Oriented Control (FOC) case, this is achieved by implementing convenient Look-Up Tables (LUT) and PI controllers, while in the Model Predictive Control (MPC) case it is obtained via a particular cost function. Moreover, in the MPC case, an additional power loss tracking factor is introduced in the cost function, in order to minimize the total motor losses over the entire drive cycle. The proposed control techniques are evaluated under both steady state and dynamic conditions, illustrating the relative advantages of MPC in terms of robustness and dynamic behavior.","PeriodicalId":325413,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEMPED.2017.8062379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
This paper compares two torque control methodologies, namely Field Oriented and Model Predictive ones, for monitoring Interior Permanent Magnet Motor (IPMM) over a wide speed range. IPMM magnetic saturation and cross coupling effects are taken into consideration, increasing significantly the precision of the developed controllers. Maximum Torque per Ampere (MTPA) and Field Weakening (FW) operating modes below and above the rated speed, respectively, are considered for an Electric Vehicle (EV) application. In the Field Oriented Control (FOC) case, this is achieved by implementing convenient Look-Up Tables (LUT) and PI controllers, while in the Model Predictive Control (MPC) case it is obtained via a particular cost function. Moreover, in the MPC case, an additional power loss tracking factor is introduced in the cost function, in order to minimize the total motor losses over the entire drive cycle. The proposed control techniques are evaluated under both steady state and dynamic conditions, illustrating the relative advantages of MPC in terms of robustness and dynamic behavior.