Reflection and Feedback as Predictors of Directed Development of Assessment Competence

I. Labak, M. Sablić, B. Bognar
{"title":"Reflection and Feedback as Predictors of Directed Development of Assessment Competence","authors":"I. Labak, M. Sablić, B. Bognar","doi":"10.22364/atee.2022.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment is part of the complex profile of teacher competencies that supports the development of teachers’ and students’ generic and professional competencies. The paper focuses on formative assessment, i.e., the approach to assessment as learning and assessment for learning that takes place during the learning process, which ultimately contributes to self-regulated learning. This paper aims to determine if there are changes in the use of formative assessment in the classroom. For this purpose, Biology teachers participated in reflective learning-based professional development. In this action research, reflective learning was applied in learning communities. The learning process consisted of acquiring theoretical knowledge about formative assessment, applying what has been learned in the classroom, and (self)analyzing video recordings of the lessons according to the formative assessment representation form. The analysis provided (internal) feedback on progress and aspects for improvement as a starting point for a new cycle of reflective learning. The initial recordings of the lessons showed that formative assessment needs improvement. The results indicate that professional development in formative assessment varied among teachers. One teacher was found to make steady progress during professional development, while other teachers were found to have sporadic and incoherent changes. We believe that the improvement of the professional development model should include explicit incentives for teachers to implement phases of self-regulated learning during professional development.","PeriodicalId":286803,"journal":{"name":"To Be or Not to Be a Great Educator","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"To Be or Not to Be a Great Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/atee.2022.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment is part of the complex profile of teacher competencies that supports the development of teachers’ and students’ generic and professional competencies. The paper focuses on formative assessment, i.e., the approach to assessment as learning and assessment for learning that takes place during the learning process, which ultimately contributes to self-regulated learning. This paper aims to determine if there are changes in the use of formative assessment in the classroom. For this purpose, Biology teachers participated in reflective learning-based professional development. In this action research, reflective learning was applied in learning communities. The learning process consisted of acquiring theoretical knowledge about formative assessment, applying what has been learned in the classroom, and (self)analyzing video recordings of the lessons according to the formative assessment representation form. The analysis provided (internal) feedback on progress and aspects for improvement as a starting point for a new cycle of reflective learning. The initial recordings of the lessons showed that formative assessment needs improvement. The results indicate that professional development in formative assessment varied among teachers. One teacher was found to make steady progress during professional development, while other teachers were found to have sporadic and incoherent changes. We believe that the improvement of the professional development model should include explicit incentives for teachers to implement phases of self-regulated learning during professional development.
反思与反馈作为评估能力定向发展的预测因子
该评估是支持教师和学生的一般能力和专业能力发展的复杂教师能力概况的一部分。本文的重点是形成性评估,即将评估视为学习的方法和在学习过程中发生的对学习的评估,最终有助于自我调节学习。本文旨在确定课堂上形成性评估的使用是否发生了变化。为此,生物教师参与了以反思学习为基础的专业发展。本行动研究将反思性学习应用于学习型社区。学习过程包括获取形成性评价的理论知识,将所学知识应用到课堂上,并根据形成性评价的表现形式(自我)分析课程录像。分析提供了关于进展和改进方面的(内部)反馈,作为反思性学习新周期的起点。最初的课程记录表明,形成性评估需要改进。结果表明,教师在形成性评价方面的专业发展存在差异。一名教师在专业发展过程中取得了稳定的进步,而其他教师则出现了零星和不连贯的变化。我们认为,专业发展模式的改进应包括明确激励教师在专业发展过程中实施自我调节学习的阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信