Mowgli

Daniel Seybold, M. Keppler, Daniel Gründler, Jörg Domaschka
{"title":"Mowgli","authors":"Daniel Seybold, M. Keppler, Daniel Gründler, Jörg Domaschka","doi":"10.1145/3297663.3310303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Big Data and IoT applications require highly-scalable database management system (DBMS), preferably operated in the cloud to ensure scalability also on the resource level. As the number of existing distributed DBMS is extensive, the selection and operation of a distributed DBMS in the cloud is a challenging task. While DBMS benchmarking is a supportive approach, existing frameworks do not cope with the runtime constraints of distributed DBMS and the volatility of cloud environments. Hence, DBMS evaluation frameworks need to consider DBMS runtime and cloud resource constraints to enable portable and reproducible results. In this paper we present Mowgli, a novel evaluation framework that enables the evaluation of non-functional DBMS features in correlation with DBMS runtime and cloud resource constraints. Mowgli fully automates the execution of cloud and DBMS agnostic evaluation scenarios, including DBMS cluster adaptations. The evaluation of Mowgli is based on two IoT-driven scenarios, comprising the DBMSs Apache Cassandra and Couchbase, nine DBMS runtime configurations, two cloud providers with two different storage backends. Mowgli automates the execution of the resulting 102 evaluation scenarios, verifying its support for portable and reproducible DBMS evaluations. The results provide extensive insights into the DBMS scalability and the impact of different cloud resources. The significance of the results is validated by the correlation with existing DBMS evaluation results.","PeriodicalId":273447,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3297663.3310303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Big Data and IoT applications require highly-scalable database management system (DBMS), preferably operated in the cloud to ensure scalability also on the resource level. As the number of existing distributed DBMS is extensive, the selection and operation of a distributed DBMS in the cloud is a challenging task. While DBMS benchmarking is a supportive approach, existing frameworks do not cope with the runtime constraints of distributed DBMS and the volatility of cloud environments. Hence, DBMS evaluation frameworks need to consider DBMS runtime and cloud resource constraints to enable portable and reproducible results. In this paper we present Mowgli, a novel evaluation framework that enables the evaluation of non-functional DBMS features in correlation with DBMS runtime and cloud resource constraints. Mowgli fully automates the execution of cloud and DBMS agnostic evaluation scenarios, including DBMS cluster adaptations. The evaluation of Mowgli is based on two IoT-driven scenarios, comprising the DBMSs Apache Cassandra and Couchbase, nine DBMS runtime configurations, two cloud providers with two different storage backends. Mowgli automates the execution of the resulting 102 evaluation scenarios, verifying its support for portable and reproducible DBMS evaluations. The results provide extensive insights into the DBMS scalability and the impact of different cloud resources. The significance of the results is validated by the correlation with existing DBMS evaluation results.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信