Stripping the Gears of White Supremacy: A Call to Abate Reliance on Court Fines & Fees and Revitalize State and Local Taxation

Hayley Hahn
{"title":"Stripping the Gears of White Supremacy: A Call to Abate Reliance on Court Fines & Fees and Revitalize State and Local Taxation","authors":"Hayley Hahn","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3875617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, states and municipalities have increasingly relied on court fines and fees to overcome budget shortfalls. Existing court debt literature underscores the varied and adverse impacts of court debt, as well as the disproportionate incidence of such debt on people of color and poor people of all races. Yet few pieces of scholarship directly link increased imposition of court fines and fees to decreased dependence on traditional progressive taxes. This essay aims to fill the gap. Using the law and political economy (LPE) framework, this paper argues that increased imposition of court debt derives from heightened antitax sentiment and the erosion of the state and local tax bases. In the process, this essay contends that both the tax and court debt systems reflect and exacerbate racial inequality. In advancing the above argument, this essay makes three broad conceptual claims. First, by revisiting the history of tax revolts, and underscoring that these movements precipitated increased reliance on court fines and fees, it demonstrates that antitax sentiment reflects racial, not merely economic, anxieties. Second, the essay establishes that court debt is an inferior revenue source as compared to traditional taxes when evaluated using either traditional tax policy metrics or racial justice principles. Third, drawing from existing tax literature, this essay argues for several policy and community-based interventions to cease reliance on court debt and revitalize progressive taxes. As such, this essay provides a conceptual framework for advancing the LPE movement’s mission.","PeriodicalId":107457,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Parties (Attorneys; Witnesses; etc.) (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Parties (Attorneys; Witnesses; etc.) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3875617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, states and municipalities have increasingly relied on court fines and fees to overcome budget shortfalls. Existing court debt literature underscores the varied and adverse impacts of court debt, as well as the disproportionate incidence of such debt on people of color and poor people of all races. Yet few pieces of scholarship directly link increased imposition of court fines and fees to decreased dependence on traditional progressive taxes. This essay aims to fill the gap. Using the law and political economy (LPE) framework, this paper argues that increased imposition of court debt derives from heightened antitax sentiment and the erosion of the state and local tax bases. In the process, this essay contends that both the tax and court debt systems reflect and exacerbate racial inequality. In advancing the above argument, this essay makes three broad conceptual claims. First, by revisiting the history of tax revolts, and underscoring that these movements precipitated increased reliance on court fines and fees, it demonstrates that antitax sentiment reflects racial, not merely economic, anxieties. Second, the essay establishes that court debt is an inferior revenue source as compared to traditional taxes when evaluated using either traditional tax policy metrics or racial justice principles. Third, drawing from existing tax literature, this essay argues for several policy and community-based interventions to cease reliance on court debt and revitalize progressive taxes. As such, this essay provides a conceptual framework for advancing the LPE movement’s mission.
剥去白人至上的年代:呼吁减少对法院罚款和费用的依赖,重振州和地方税收
近几十年来,各州和市政当局越来越依赖法院罚款和收费来弥补预算不足。现有的法院债务文献强调了法院债务的各种不利影响,以及这种债务对有色人种和所有种族的穷人的不成比例的发生率。然而,很少有学术研究将法院罚款和费用的增加与对传统累进税的依赖程度的降低直接联系起来。本文旨在填补这一空白。利用法律和政治经济学(LPE)框架,本文认为,法院债务征收的增加源于反税收情绪的加剧以及州和地方税基的侵蚀。在此过程中,本文认为税收和法院债务系统都反映并加剧了种族不平等。在推进上述论点时,本文提出了三个广泛的概念主张。首先,通过回顾税收反抗的历史,并强调这些运动促成了对法院罚款和费用的日益依赖,它表明,反税收情绪反映了种族焦虑,而不仅仅是经济焦虑。其次,本文确定,当使用传统税收政策指标或种族正义原则进行评估时,与传统税收相比,法院债务是一种次等的收入来源。第三,根据现有的税收文献,本文提出了一些政策和基于社区的干预措施,以停止对法院债务的依赖,并振兴累进税。因此,本文为推进LPE运动的使命提供了一个概念性框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信