Challenges to Investment Ethics in the Norwegian Petroleum Fund: a Newspaper Debate

Kristian Alm
{"title":"Challenges to Investment Ethics in the Norwegian Petroleum Fund: a Newspaper Debate","authors":"Kristian Alm","doi":"10.21825/philosophica.82176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I will describe the main elements of the Norwegian press’s moral confrontation with the Government Pension Fund’s ethical investment management when it was in an introductory phase in early 2005, with special emphasis on one newspaper, Stavanger Aftenblad. The press criticized the fund’s fresh investment profile and intended exclusionary practice before it had really st arted in earnest. Then I will focus on how the press’s unilateral criticism of the fund’s investment practice at the ti me ove rshadowed a discussion of any defects i n the ethical pri nciples f or in vestment. And I will focus on the press’s lack of distinguishing between information and sensation. In conclusion I point out that in 2006 the press has abandoned its critical stance from 2005 and has now a tendency to idealize the fund’s exclusionary practice and the underlying principles.","PeriodicalId":322225,"journal":{"name":"Information asymmetries in socially responsible investment","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information asymmetries in socially responsible investment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

In this article I will describe the main elements of the Norwegian press’s moral confrontation with the Government Pension Fund’s ethical investment management when it was in an introductory phase in early 2005, with special emphasis on one newspaper, Stavanger Aftenblad. The press criticized the fund’s fresh investment profile and intended exclusionary practice before it had really st arted in earnest. Then I will focus on how the press’s unilateral criticism of the fund’s investment practice at the ti me ove rshadowed a discussion of any defects i n the ethical pri nciples f or in vestment. And I will focus on the press’s lack of distinguishing between information and sensation. In conclusion I point out that in 2006 the press has abandoned its critical stance from 2005 and has now a tendency to idealize the fund’s exclusionary practice and the underlying principles.
挪威石油基金投资伦理的挑战:报纸辩论
在这篇文章中,我将描述挪威媒体与政府养老基金道德投资管理的道德对抗的主要因素,当它在2005年初处于入门阶段时,特别强调一家报纸,斯塔万格晚报。在该基金真正开始之前,媒体就对其新的投资形象和有意的排他性做法提出了批评。然后,我将重点讨论当时媒体对该基金投资行为的单方面批评如何掩盖了对投资道德原则缺陷的讨论。我将重点关注媒体对信息和感觉的不区分。最后,我指出,2006年,媒体放弃了2005年以来的批评立场,现在有一种将imf的排他做法和基本原则理想化的倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信