"Mind Reading": How and for what?

Cristiano Castelfranchi
{"title":"\"Mind Reading\": How and for what?","authors":"Cristiano Castelfranchi","doi":"10.36959/447/345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper tries to explain: How we tend to automatically ascribe mental representations to social actors on the basis of scripts, roles, categories and prejudices, norms, and several heuristics; or by default; how scripts and roles should be filled in with the actors' mental attitudes; how social interaction systematically requires assumptions about the other's mind; how those mental attitudes can be the non-intended or non-understood function of our behavior/role. What really matters is that we assume that those beliefs and goals are there, and we act 'as if' it were so. A further claim of this work is that this mechanism of mind ascription while reading another's behavior or its traces (stigmergy), is the basis for a fundamental form of communication: Behavioral Implicit Communication (or BIC), which works without words or special protocols. An efficient coordination-in humans but also in artificial agents-exploits (or should exploit) not only the mere 'observation' of such agents, but more precisely this form of silent communication (which should not be confused with non-verbal or expressive communication). The message-sending paradigm dominating CSCW, MAS, HCI, and H-Robot-I, is here criticized; necessity and advantages of BIC for coordination and cooperation are presented.","PeriodicalId":369479,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cognitive Science","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/447/345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper tries to explain: How we tend to automatically ascribe mental representations to social actors on the basis of scripts, roles, categories and prejudices, norms, and several heuristics; or by default; how scripts and roles should be filled in with the actors' mental attitudes; how social interaction systematically requires assumptions about the other's mind; how those mental attitudes can be the non-intended or non-understood function of our behavior/role. What really matters is that we assume that those beliefs and goals are there, and we act 'as if' it were so. A further claim of this work is that this mechanism of mind ascription while reading another's behavior or its traces (stigmergy), is the basis for a fundamental form of communication: Behavioral Implicit Communication (or BIC), which works without words or special protocols. An efficient coordination-in humans but also in artificial agents-exploits (or should exploit) not only the mere 'observation' of such agents, but more precisely this form of silent communication (which should not be confused with non-verbal or expressive communication). The message-sending paradigm dominating CSCW, MAS, HCI, and H-Robot-I, is here criticized; necessity and advantages of BIC for coordination and cooperation are presented.
“读心术”:怎么读?为什么读?
本文试图解释:我们如何倾向于在剧本、角色、类别和偏见、规范和一些启发式的基础上自动将心理表征归因于社会行动者;或者默认;如何用演员的心理态度来填充剧本和角色;社会互动如何系统性地要求对他人的思想进行假设;这些心理态度如何成为我们行为/角色的非预期或不可理解的功能。真正重要的是,我们假设这些信念和目标是存在的,并且我们的行为“好像”是如此。这项工作的进一步主张是,在阅读他人的行为或其痕迹(污名化)时,这种心理归因机制是一种基本沟通形式的基础:行为内隐沟通(BIC),它不需要言语或特殊协议。有效的协调——无论是人类还是人工代理——利用(或应该利用)的不仅仅是对这些代理的“观察”,更确切地说,是这种形式的无声交流(不应与非语言或表达性交流混淆)。CSCW、MAS、HCI和H-Robot-I主导的消息发送范式在这里受到了批评;提出了BIC协调合作的必要性和优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信