Handling dropout and clustering in longitudinal multicentre clinical trials

P. Bianco, R. Borgoni
{"title":"Handling dropout and clustering in longitudinal multicentre clinical trials","authors":"P. Bianco, R. Borgoni","doi":"10.1191/1471082X06st113oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many clinical trials enrol patients from different medical centres. Multi-centre studies are particularly helpful in cancer research as they allow researchers to evaluate the efficacy of a therapy in a variety of patients and settings, making it possible to investigate the effect of treatments in those cases when it is difficult, or even impossible, for a single centre to recruit the required number of patients. It is often argued, however, that despite agreement among different centres to follow common standardized protocols, variation may occur in both baseline characteristics of the recruited patients and in treatment effects. This heterogeneity should be detected and, if present, accounted for in the data analysis. Furthermore, the longitudinal nature of these types of experimental studies raises the problem of attrition, that is, patients may dropout of the study for a number of reasons mainly death or disease progression. In this paper, we consider the health related quality of life of advanced melanoma patients in a longitudinal multi-centre randomized clinical trial comparing two different anti-tumoural treatments. We propose a Heckman type model to account for the possibility that patients dropout according to a non-ignorable mechanism. The model is extended to a multilevel setting to account both for the longitudinal nature and the multi-centre structure of the design. We found a strong variation across centres in the quality of life evaluation. The effect of centres on the dropout was not found to be relevant in the considered data although dropout does depend on patient′s characteristics.","PeriodicalId":354759,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Modeling","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1191/1471082X06st113oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Many clinical trials enrol patients from different medical centres. Multi-centre studies are particularly helpful in cancer research as they allow researchers to evaluate the efficacy of a therapy in a variety of patients and settings, making it possible to investigate the effect of treatments in those cases when it is difficult, or even impossible, for a single centre to recruit the required number of patients. It is often argued, however, that despite agreement among different centres to follow common standardized protocols, variation may occur in both baseline characteristics of the recruited patients and in treatment effects. This heterogeneity should be detected and, if present, accounted for in the data analysis. Furthermore, the longitudinal nature of these types of experimental studies raises the problem of attrition, that is, patients may dropout of the study for a number of reasons mainly death or disease progression. In this paper, we consider the health related quality of life of advanced melanoma patients in a longitudinal multi-centre randomized clinical trial comparing two different anti-tumoural treatments. We propose a Heckman type model to account for the possibility that patients dropout according to a non-ignorable mechanism. The model is extended to a multilevel setting to account both for the longitudinal nature and the multi-centre structure of the design. We found a strong variation across centres in the quality of life evaluation. The effect of centres on the dropout was not found to be relevant in the considered data although dropout does depend on patient′s characteristics.
纵向多中心临床试验中退出和聚类的处理
许多临床试验招募了来自不同医疗中心的患者。多中心研究对癌症研究特别有帮助,因为它们使研究人员能够评估一种疗法在各种患者和环境中的疗效,从而有可能在单个中心难以招募到所需数量的患者的情况下调查治疗的效果。然而,人们经常争论,尽管不同的中心同意遵循共同的标准化方案,但在招募患者的基线特征和治疗效果方面可能会出现差异。这种异质性应被发现,如果存在,应在数据分析中加以解释。此外,这些类型的实验研究的纵向性质提出了损耗问题,即患者可能因死亡或疾病进展等多种原因退出研究。在本文中,我们在一项纵向多中心随机临床试验中比较了两种不同的抗肿瘤治疗方法,考虑了晚期黑色素瘤患者的健康相关生活质量。我们提出了一个Heckman类型的模型来解释患者根据一个不可忽视的机制退出的可能性。该模型被扩展到多级设置,以考虑设计的纵向性质和多中心结构。我们发现各中心在生活质量评估方面存在很大差异。在考虑的数据中没有发现中心对辍学率的影响,尽管辍学率确实取决于患者的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信