Developing a Human Centred AI Masters: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Barry Feeney, M. Zuccarini, Tarry Singh, H. Aldewereld, S. Marrone, Keith Quille
{"title":"Developing a Human Centred AI Masters: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly","authors":"Barry Feeney, M. Zuccarini, Tarry Singh, H. Aldewereld, S. Marrone, Keith Quille","doi":"10.1145/3502717.3532120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing use of AI in industry and society not only expects but demands that we build human-centred competencies into our AI education programmes. The computing education community needs to adapt, and while the adoption of standalone ethics modules into AI programmes or the inclusion of ethical content into traditional applied AI modules is progressing, it is not enough. To foster student competencies to create AI innovations that respect and support the protection of individual rights and society, a novel ground-up approach is needed. This panel presents on one such approach, the development of a Human-Centred AI Masters (HCAIM) as well as the insights and lessons learned from the process. In particular, we discuss the design decisions that have led to the multi-institutional master's programme. Moreover, this panel allows for discussion on pedagogical and methodological approaches, content knowledge areas and the delivery of such a novel programme, along with challenges faced, to inform and learn from other educators that are considering developing such programmes.","PeriodicalId":274484,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 2","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3502717.3532120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The increasing use of AI in industry and society not only expects but demands that we build human-centred competencies into our AI education programmes. The computing education community needs to adapt, and while the adoption of standalone ethics modules into AI programmes or the inclusion of ethical content into traditional applied AI modules is progressing, it is not enough. To foster student competencies to create AI innovations that respect and support the protection of individual rights and society, a novel ground-up approach is needed. This panel presents on one such approach, the development of a Human-Centred AI Masters (HCAIM) as well as the insights and lessons learned from the process. In particular, we discuss the design decisions that have led to the multi-institutional master's programme. Moreover, this panel allows for discussion on pedagogical and methodological approaches, content knowledge areas and the delivery of such a novel programme, along with challenges faced, to inform and learn from other educators that are considering developing such programmes.
开发以人为本的AI大师:好、坏、丑
人工智能在工业和社会中越来越多的应用,不仅期望而且要求我们在人工智能教育项目中建立以人为本的能力。计算机教育界需要适应,虽然在人工智能课程中采用独立的伦理模块或在传统的应用人工智能模块中加入伦理内容正在取得进展,但这还不够。为了培养学生创造尊重和支持保护个人权利和社会的人工智能创新的能力,需要一种全新的自下而上的方法。本小组介绍了一种这样的方法,即以人为本的人工智能大师(HCAIM)的发展,以及从这一过程中获得的见解和经验教训。特别是,我们讨论了导致多机构硕士课程的设计决策。此外,该小组允许讨论教学和方法方法、内容知识领域和这种新方案的实施,以及面临的挑战,以便向正在考虑制定这种方案的其他教育工作者提供信息和学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信