Adoption of International Standards on Auditing (Isa): Do Institutional Factors Matter?

Pran Boolaky, T. Soobaroyen
{"title":"Adoption of International Standards on Auditing (Isa): Do Institutional Factors Matter?","authors":"Pran Boolaky, T. Soobaroyen","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Informed by the neo-institutional perspective, this study seeks for the first time to investigate empirically the determinants of ISA adoption and commitment to harmonisation on a cross-national basis (89 countries). The findings show that the protection of minority interests, regulatory enforcement, lenders/borrowers rights, foreign aid, prevalence of foreign ownership, educational attainment and particular forms of political system (level of democracy) prevailing in a country, are observed to be significant predictors of the extent of commitment to the adoption and harmonisation of ISAs. Our statistical analysis therefore suggests that coercive, mimetic and normative pressure have a significant impact on ISA adoption relative to economic (efficiency-led) factors. Our findings imply that current efforts by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) and other international agencies to implement ISAs need to recognise that a broad set of institutional factors, rather than narrow economic ones, are of relevance in the development of audit policymaking, practice and regulation worldwide.","PeriodicalId":172735,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Auditing","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Informed by the neo-institutional perspective, this study seeks for the first time to investigate empirically the determinants of ISA adoption and commitment to harmonisation on a cross-national basis (89 countries). The findings show that the protection of minority interests, regulatory enforcement, lenders/borrowers rights, foreign aid, prevalence of foreign ownership, educational attainment and particular forms of political system (level of democracy) prevailing in a country, are observed to be significant predictors of the extent of commitment to the adoption and harmonisation of ISAs. Our statistical analysis therefore suggests that coercive, mimetic and normative pressure have a significant impact on ISA adoption relative to economic (efficiency-led) factors. Our findings imply that current efforts by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) and other international agencies to implement ISAs need to recognise that a broad set of institutional factors, rather than narrow economic ones, are of relevance in the development of audit policymaking, practice and regulation worldwide.
采用国际审计准则(Isa):制度因素重要吗?
在新制度视角的指导下,本研究首次寻求在跨国基础上(89个国家)对ISA采用和承诺协调的决定因素进行实证调查。研究结果表明,对少数人利益的保护、监管执法、贷款人/借款人的权利、外国援助、外国所有权的普遍程度、教育程度和一个国家普遍存在的政治制度的特定形式(民主水平),被观察到是对采用和协调isa的承诺程度的重要预测因素。因此,我们的统计分析表明,相对于经济(效率主导)因素,强制性、模仿性和规范性压力对ISA的采用有重大影响。我们的研究结果表明,国际会计师联合会(IFAC)和其他国际机构目前实施国际审计准则的努力需要认识到,与全球审计决策、实践和监管的发展相关的是一系列广泛的制度因素,而不是狭隘的经济因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信