A Path Neither Simple Nor Single

Radcliffe G. Edmonds
{"title":"A Path Neither Simple Nor Single","authors":"Radcliffe G. Edmonds","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781789621495.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter suggests that the afterlife is a very prominent concept for the ancient Greeks, and surveys a wide variety of evidence to demonstrate the myriad ways in which the Greeks conceived of the afterlife, and the ends to which such visions were deployed. This evidence covers treatments of the afterlife created over millennia throughout the Greek world, including the treatment it receives in poetry, painting, philosophy, and funerary rites. Edmonds organises these accounts through appealing to three categories: 1) visions of continuation, in which post-mortem existence is imagined as analogous to that enjoyed in life; 2) visions of compensation, in which the afterlife is seen as a correction of living existence; and 3) cosmological visions, where thinkers situate the afterlife within a wider account of the nature and function of the world. The key insight of Edmonds’ paper is that, to see Hades as a monolithic theological concept is to miss out on the particularly versatile nature of Greek beliefs, which in turn runs the danger of relegating equally valid conceptions of the afterlife to strictly cultic or minority-based divergences from the norm.","PeriodicalId":380968,"journal":{"name":"Aspects of Death and the Afterlife in Greek Literature","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aspects of Death and the Afterlife in Greek Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781789621495.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter suggests that the afterlife is a very prominent concept for the ancient Greeks, and surveys a wide variety of evidence to demonstrate the myriad ways in which the Greeks conceived of the afterlife, and the ends to which such visions were deployed. This evidence covers treatments of the afterlife created over millennia throughout the Greek world, including the treatment it receives in poetry, painting, philosophy, and funerary rites. Edmonds organises these accounts through appealing to three categories: 1) visions of continuation, in which post-mortem existence is imagined as analogous to that enjoyed in life; 2) visions of compensation, in which the afterlife is seen as a correction of living existence; and 3) cosmological visions, where thinkers situate the afterlife within a wider account of the nature and function of the world. The key insight of Edmonds’ paper is that, to see Hades as a monolithic theological concept is to miss out on the particularly versatile nature of Greek beliefs, which in turn runs the danger of relegating equally valid conceptions of the afterlife to strictly cultic or minority-based divergences from the norm.
一条既不简单也不单一的道路
本章表明,来世是古希腊人的一个非常重要的概念,并调查了各种各样的证据,以证明希腊人对来世的无数种设想,以及这些设想的目的。这些证据涵盖了几千年来希腊世界对来世的处理方式,包括诗歌、绘画、哲学和葬礼仪式对来世的处理。埃德蒙兹将这些描述归纳为三类:1)对延续的想象,在这种想象中,死后的存在被想象成与生前享受的存在类似;2)补偿观,认为来世是对现世的一种矫正;3)宇宙观,思想家将来世置于对世界本质和功能的更广泛的解释中。Edmonds论文的关键观点是,将冥界视为一个单一的神学概念,就会错过希腊信仰的特别多功能性,这反过来又有可能将同样有效的来世概念贬谪为严格的邪教或基于少数人的规范分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信