Consumers with specialised and diverse experience produce more helpful reviews

Lei Hou, Xue Pan
{"title":"Consumers with specialised and diverse experience produce more helpful reviews","authors":"Lei Hou, Xue Pan","doi":"10.1108/oir-06-2020-0244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeExperienced reviewers in general can produce high-quality product reviews, and thereby get more helpful votes. This paper explores the question that whether the depth and width of the reviewers' experience distribution have effects on the helpfulness of their reviews.Design/methodology/approachAdopting the restaurant review data from Yelp, the present paper classifies the restaurants in to different categories applying the Word2Vec technique, such as Asian or fast food. By evaluating the number of a user's historical reviews in a specific category, and the evenness of such distribution in different categories, the experience specialty and experience diversity are defined respectively.FindingsThe analysis shows that users specialised in a given category can produce more helpful reviews in that category. The users with diverse historical experience, i.e. have posted reviews for many categories, also can produce helpful reviews. In addition, the experience diversity shows a positive moderation effect on the influence of experience specialty. Thus, users with diverse experience while specialized in a particular category are the source of most helpful reviews.Originality/valueWhile previous studies mostly consider the raw number of historical reviews as a reviewer's experience, we distinguish such experience by product category and focus on the width and depth of its distribution. The results not only shed lights on the mining of high-quality reviews and reviewers but also provide insights on the management of online review platforms and electronic marketing.","PeriodicalId":143302,"journal":{"name":"Online Inf. Rev.","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Inf. Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-06-2020-0244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeExperienced reviewers in general can produce high-quality product reviews, and thereby get more helpful votes. This paper explores the question that whether the depth and width of the reviewers' experience distribution have effects on the helpfulness of their reviews.Design/methodology/approachAdopting the restaurant review data from Yelp, the present paper classifies the restaurants in to different categories applying the Word2Vec technique, such as Asian or fast food. By evaluating the number of a user's historical reviews in a specific category, and the evenness of such distribution in different categories, the experience specialty and experience diversity are defined respectively.FindingsThe analysis shows that users specialised in a given category can produce more helpful reviews in that category. The users with diverse historical experience, i.e. have posted reviews for many categories, also can produce helpful reviews. In addition, the experience diversity shows a positive moderation effect on the influence of experience specialty. Thus, users with diverse experience while specialized in a particular category are the source of most helpful reviews.Originality/valueWhile previous studies mostly consider the raw number of historical reviews as a reviewer's experience, we distinguish such experience by product category and focus on the width and depth of its distribution. The results not only shed lights on the mining of high-quality reviews and reviewers but also provide insights on the management of online review platforms and electronic marketing.
具有专业和多样化经验的消费者会产生更有用的评论
目的:经验丰富的评论者通常可以提供高质量的产品评论,从而获得更多有用的投票。本文探讨了审稿人经验分布的深度和宽度是否对审稿人的有益性有影响。设计/方法/方法采用来自Yelp的餐厅评论数据,本论文应用Word2Vec技术将餐厅分为不同的类别,例如亚洲或快餐。通过评价用户在某一特定品类中的历史评论数量,以及用户在不同品类中的历史评论分布的均匀性,分别定义体验的特殊性和体验的多样性。研究结果分析显示,专攻某一特定类别的用户可以在该类别中产生更多有用的评论。具有不同历史经验的用户,即对许多类别发表评论的用户,也可以产生有用的评论。此外,经验多样性对经验专长的影响具有正向调节作用。因此,在特定类别中具有不同经验的用户是最有用的评论的来源。原创性/价值虽然以前的研究大多将历史评论的原始数量视为评论者的经验,但我们通过产品类别区分这种经验,并关注其分布的宽度和深度。研究结果不仅为高质量评论和评论者的挖掘提供了线索,也为在线评论平台的管理和电子营销提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信