[Comparison of polyurethane and polyethylene for central venous catheter in intensive care units].

S Touquet, P Martin, D M Poisson, N Bercault, C Fleury, C Gueveler
{"title":"[Comparison of polyurethane and polyethylene for central venous catheter in intensive care units].","authors":"S Touquet,&nbsp;P Martin,&nbsp;D M Poisson,&nbsp;N Bercault,&nbsp;C Fleury,&nbsp;C Gueveler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polyurethane (PU) and polyethylene (PE) central venous catheters were compared for their respective responsabilities in catheter related sepsis (CRS). From may 1988 to may 1989, 300 central venous catheters were inserted. Insertion sites were freely chosen by physicians. The polymer type was randomized. Catheters were removed after 10 days in place. Microbial loads were assessed on insertion sites, catheter hubs and tips, and blood drawn through the catheters lumen. One hundred eighty three catheters were available for complete evaluation (101 PE, 82 PE). Eleven were responsible for CRS, 4 were colonized (BB3 according to Brun-Buisson's classification), 19 were contaminated (BB2), and 149 were sterile (BB1). When comparing the \"infected\" group (CRS+BB3) and the \"noninfected\" (BB2 + BB1), no difference appeared between the tested polymers. CRS were significantly associated with insertion into the internal jugular vein. It seems useless to exclude from clinical practice any of the biomaterials tested.</p>","PeriodicalId":7441,"journal":{"name":"Agressologie: revue internationale de physio-biologie et de pharmacologie appliquees aux effets de l'agression","volume":"33 Spec No 3 ","pages":"140-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agressologie: revue internationale de physio-biologie et de pharmacologie appliquees aux effets de l'agression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polyurethane (PU) and polyethylene (PE) central venous catheters were compared for their respective responsabilities in catheter related sepsis (CRS). From may 1988 to may 1989, 300 central venous catheters were inserted. Insertion sites were freely chosen by physicians. The polymer type was randomized. Catheters were removed after 10 days in place. Microbial loads were assessed on insertion sites, catheter hubs and tips, and blood drawn through the catheters lumen. One hundred eighty three catheters were available for complete evaluation (101 PE, 82 PE). Eleven were responsible for CRS, 4 were colonized (BB3 according to Brun-Buisson's classification), 19 were contaminated (BB2), and 149 were sterile (BB1). When comparing the "infected" group (CRS+BB3) and the "noninfected" (BB2 + BB1), no difference appeared between the tested polymers. CRS were significantly associated with insertion into the internal jugular vein. It seems useless to exclude from clinical practice any of the biomaterials tested.

[重症监护病房中心静脉导管用聚氨酯与聚乙烯的比较]。
比较了聚氨酯(PU)和聚乙烯(PE)中心静脉导管在导管相关性脓毒症(CRS)中的作用。1988年5月至1989年5月,共置入中心静脉导管300根。插入部位由医生自由选择。聚合物类型随机化。放置10天后取出导管。评估插入部位、导管中心和尖端以及通过导管管腔抽取的血液的微生物负荷。183根导管可用于全面评估(101根PE, 82根PE)。11个负责CRS, 4个定植(Brun-Buisson分类为BB3), 19个被污染(BB2), 149个无菌(BB1)。当比较“感染”组(CRS+BB3)和“未感染”组(BB2 + BB1)时,测试的聚合物之间没有差异。CRS与颈内静脉的插入有显著的相关性。在临床实践中排除任何已测试的生物材料似乎是无用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信