Determination of residual wall interferences for measurements on the TWIG model-comparison of different methods and analysis

H. Holst, J. Archambaud, A. Mignosi, M. Jacobs
{"title":"Determination of residual wall interferences for measurements on the TWIG model-comparison of different methods and analysis","authors":"H. Holst, J. Archambaud, A. Mignosi, M. Jacobs","doi":"10.1109/ICIASF.1999.827175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measurements have been carried out in the dimensional adaptive test sections of the Transonic Windtunnel Gottingen TWG of DLR and the T2 wind tunnel of ONERA Toulouse. The TWIG model (Transonic Wall Interference Generator) was available in two different scales, so that for the test sections of different sizes, the relative model size was the same. The wall adaptation was performed using the fast Wedemeyer/Lamarche method for determining the wall shapes in both cases. As a first step, different methods for the determination of residual wall interferences have been applied to data from the adaptive test section of the University of Southampton, U.o.S. These were regarded as very reliable and accurate, and wall contour data and very dense pressure distributions were available. Residual wall interferences computed by the U.o.S., DLR, ONERA and NLR show very good agreement. The measurements on the two different TWIG models in the adaptive test sections of T2 and TWG show good agreement for the wall shapes and the measured pressure distribution. Data from TWG were taken for the determination of residual wall interferences by the different methods. The residual wall interferences do not agree so perfectly as they had with the U.o.S. Data. The reasons for this are/could possibly be: wall pressure data not so dense as before; influence of the finite length of the test section; model representation not \"good\" enough; model not centrally placed; support influences; exit section not taken into account.","PeriodicalId":291132,"journal":{"name":"ICIASF 99. 18th International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities. Record (Cat. No.99CH37025)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICIASF 99. 18th International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities. Record (Cat. No.99CH37025)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIASF.1999.827175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurements have been carried out in the dimensional adaptive test sections of the Transonic Windtunnel Gottingen TWG of DLR and the T2 wind tunnel of ONERA Toulouse. The TWIG model (Transonic Wall Interference Generator) was available in two different scales, so that for the test sections of different sizes, the relative model size was the same. The wall adaptation was performed using the fast Wedemeyer/Lamarche method for determining the wall shapes in both cases. As a first step, different methods for the determination of residual wall interferences have been applied to data from the adaptive test section of the University of Southampton, U.o.S. These were regarded as very reliable and accurate, and wall contour data and very dense pressure distributions were available. Residual wall interferences computed by the U.o.S., DLR, ONERA and NLR show very good agreement. The measurements on the two different TWIG models in the adaptive test sections of T2 and TWG show good agreement for the wall shapes and the measured pressure distribution. Data from TWG were taken for the determination of residual wall interferences by the different methods. The residual wall interferences do not agree so perfectly as they had with the U.o.S. Data. The reasons for this are/could possibly be: wall pressure data not so dense as before; influence of the finite length of the test section; model representation not "good" enough; model not centrally placed; support influences; exit section not taken into account.
在TWIG模型上测量残余壁干扰的确定——不同方法的比较与分析
在德国铁路公司哥廷根跨声速风洞TWG和法国铁路公司图卢兹T2跨声速风洞的尺寸自适应试验段进行了测量。TWIG模型(跨音速壁干涉发生器)有两种不同的尺度,因此对于不同尺寸的测试截面,相对模型尺寸是相同的。采用快速Wedemeyer/Lamarche方法来确定两种情况下的壁面形状。首先,对来自美国南安普顿大学的自适应试验段的数据应用了不同的方法来确定残余壁面干扰,这些数据被认为是非常可靠和准确的,并且可以获得壁面轮廓数据和非常密集的压力分布。美国、DLR、ONERA和NLR计算的残壁干扰具有很好的一致性。在T2和TWG自适应试验段对两种不同TWIG模型的测量结果表明,壁面形状和实测压力分布吻合较好。利用TWG的数据,用不同的方法测定了残余壁干扰。残余墙的干扰并不像美国的数据那样完全一致。造成这种情况的原因可能是:壁压数据不像以前那么密集;试验截面有限长度的影响;模型表示不够“好”;模型不集中放置;支持的影响;退出部分不考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书