Accuracy analysis of FM chirp in GNU radio-based FMCW radar for multiple target detection

Ershad Junus Amin, A. B. Suksmono, A. Munir
{"title":"Accuracy analysis of FM chirp in GNU radio-based FMCW radar for multiple target detection","authors":"Ershad Junus Amin, A. B. Suksmono, A. Munir","doi":"10.1109/IC3INA.2014.7042611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, different waveforms of frequency modulation (FM) chirp are investigated to analyze the accuracy of GNU radio-based frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar for multiple target detection. The 3 waveforms used for the investigation as FM chirp are sinusoidal, triangular, and sawtooth waveforms. The analysis is performed by use of GNU radio referred as an open source software-define-radio project. There are 2 methods employed for the detection process; the first is real-condition simulation method and the second is USRP-based implementation method. In the analysis, some targets in different ranges are characterized using both methods to determine the accuracy of target range. By using FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) function from Matlab® to obtain the result in frequency domain, both methods show that the triangular waveform has the highest average accuracy, i.e. 95.73% for the 1st method and 99.75% for the 2nd method. The sawtooth waveform has the lower average accuracy than the triangular, i.e. 94.93 for the 1st method and 98.33% for the 2nd method, whilst the sinusoidal waveform has the lowest average accuracy, i.e. 92.60% for the 1st method and 98.59% for the 2nd method. From the result, it shows that the USRP-based implementation method has better average accuracy than the real-condition simulation method.","PeriodicalId":120043,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications (IC3INA)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications (IC3INA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3INA.2014.7042611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In this paper, different waveforms of frequency modulation (FM) chirp are investigated to analyze the accuracy of GNU radio-based frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar for multiple target detection. The 3 waveforms used for the investigation as FM chirp are sinusoidal, triangular, and sawtooth waveforms. The analysis is performed by use of GNU radio referred as an open source software-define-radio project. There are 2 methods employed for the detection process; the first is real-condition simulation method and the second is USRP-based implementation method. In the analysis, some targets in different ranges are characterized using both methods to determine the accuracy of target range. By using FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) function from Matlab® to obtain the result in frequency domain, both methods show that the triangular waveform has the highest average accuracy, i.e. 95.73% for the 1st method and 99.75% for the 2nd method. The sawtooth waveform has the lower average accuracy than the triangular, i.e. 94.93 for the 1st method and 98.33% for the 2nd method, whilst the sinusoidal waveform has the lowest average accuracy, i.e. 92.60% for the 1st method and 98.59% for the 2nd method. From the result, it shows that the USRP-based implementation method has better average accuracy than the real-condition simulation method.
基于GNU无线电的FMCW雷达多目标检测调频啁啾精度分析
本文研究了调频(FM)啁啾的不同波形,分析了基于GNU无线电的调频连续波(FMCW)雷达用于多目标探测的精度。用于调频啁啾调查的三种波形是正弦、三角形和锯齿波形。分析是通过使用GNU无线电(称为开源软件定义无线电项目)来完成的。检测过程采用2种方法;一种是实景仿真方法,二是基于usrp的实现方法。在分析中,利用这两种方法对不同距离的目标进行了表征,以确定目标距离的精度。利用Matlab®中的FFT (Fast Fourier Transform)函数在频域上获得结果,两种方法均表明三角波形的平均精度最高,第一种方法为95.73%,第二种方法为99.75%。锯齿形波形的平均精度低于三角形波形,第一种方法为94.93,第二种方法为98.33%,而正弦波形的平均精度最低,第一种方法为92.60%,第二种方法为98.59%。结果表明,基于usrp的实现方法比实际仿真方法具有更好的平均精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信