Evaluation of a Stakeholder Satisfaction-oriented Method for Prioritising Change Requests

R. Schmid, Samuel Fricker
{"title":"Evaluation of a Stakeholder Satisfaction-oriented Method for Prioritising Change Requests","authors":"R. Schmid, Samuel Fricker","doi":"10.1109/RE51729.2021.00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prioritisation of change requests for an evolving software is an important and complex activity in the continuous requirements engineering and release planning of an evolving product. We have explored such prioritisation with an organisation consisting of several business units appearing as stakeholders that compete for the same development resources. The challenge lay in taking objective factors like the cost-benefit ratio and technical dependencies of the requests into account while creating a high level of stakeholder satisfaction with the defined release scope. Together with the organisation, we have designed and implemented a tailored method that uses the stakeholders’ satisfaction as a structured means for validating the criteria-based prioritisation results. The paper extends prior work by taking the perspective of the organisational stakeholders and describing the method design from the organisation’s perspective, reports the use of the method in the organisation, and summarises the lessons learned from using the method in the organisation. The results are useful to increase the maturity of prioritisation in industrialpractice.","PeriodicalId":440285,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE51729.2021.00033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prioritisation of change requests for an evolving software is an important and complex activity in the continuous requirements engineering and release planning of an evolving product. We have explored such prioritisation with an organisation consisting of several business units appearing as stakeholders that compete for the same development resources. The challenge lay in taking objective factors like the cost-benefit ratio and technical dependencies of the requests into account while creating a high level of stakeholder satisfaction with the defined release scope. Together with the organisation, we have designed and implemented a tailored method that uses the stakeholders’ satisfaction as a structured means for validating the criteria-based prioritisation results. The paper extends prior work by taking the perspective of the organisational stakeholders and describing the method design from the organisation’s perspective, reports the use of the method in the organisation, and summarises the lessons learned from using the method in the organisation. The results are useful to increase the maturity of prioritisation in industrialpractice.
评估以利益相关者满意度为导向的变更请求优先级排序方法
在不断发展的产品的持续需求工程和发布计划中,对不断发展的软件进行变更请求的优先级排序是一项重要而复杂的活动。我们已经在一个由几个业务单元组成的组织中探索了这种优先级划分,这些业务单元表现为争夺相同开发资源的利益相关者。挑战在于考虑客观因素,如成本-收益比和请求的技术依赖性,同时对已定义的发布范围创建高水平的涉众满意度。与组织一起,我们设计并实施了一种定制的方法,该方法使用利益相关者的满意度作为验证基于标准的优先级结果的结构化手段。本文通过从组织利益相关者的角度出发,从组织的角度描述方法设计,扩展了先前的工作,报告了该方法在组织中的使用,并总结了在组织中使用该方法的经验教训。研究结果对提高工业实践中排序的成熟度具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信