{"title":"9. Flexibility of benefit","authors":"Gary Watt","doi":"10.1093/HE/9780198747635.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the so-called ‘rule in Saunders v. Vautier’, the beneficiaries of an expressly created private trust may terminate the trust if they are in unanimous agreement and are all competent adults, and are, between them, absolutely entitled to the trust property. This chapter examines the issue of ‘flexibility of benefit’, the extent to which beneficiaries may be able to take benefits under a trust despite limitations on their beneficial ownership, as well as the extent to which limitations on their beneficial ownership may be varied or entirely removed. It shows that under the Trustee Act 1925, trustees have a discretionary power—known as ‘the power of maintenance’—to apply income for the benefit of infant beneficiaries and a similar discretionary power, termed ‘the power of advancement’, to apply capital for the benefit of a beneficiary (infant or adult) out of his/her anticipated entitlement to the trust fund.","PeriodicalId":275159,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Equity","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HE/9780198747635.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
According to the so-called ‘rule in Saunders v. Vautier’, the beneficiaries of an expressly created private trust may terminate the trust if they are in unanimous agreement and are all competent adults, and are, between them, absolutely entitled to the trust property. This chapter examines the issue of ‘flexibility of benefit’, the extent to which beneficiaries may be able to take benefits under a trust despite limitations on their beneficial ownership, as well as the extent to which limitations on their beneficial ownership may be varied or entirely removed. It shows that under the Trustee Act 1925, trustees have a discretionary power—known as ‘the power of maintenance’—to apply income for the benefit of infant beneficiaries and a similar discretionary power, termed ‘the power of advancement’, to apply capital for the benefit of a beneficiary (infant or adult) out of his/her anticipated entitlement to the trust fund.
根据所谓的“Saunders v. Vautier规则”,明确设立的私人信托的受益人可以终止信托,如果他们一致同意,并且都是有能力的成年人,并且他们之间绝对有权获得信托财产。本章探讨了“利益的灵活性”问题,即受益人在受益人受益所有权受到限制的情况下可以在信托下获得利益的程度,以及受益人受益所有权的限制可以改变或完全取消的程度。它表明,根据1925年的《受托人法案》,受托人有一种自由裁量权,即“维持权”,可以将收入用于婴儿受益人的利益,也有一种类似的自由裁量权,称为“推进权”,可以从受益人(婴儿或成人)的预期信托基金权利中为其申请资本。