The Spiritual Exercises and Illuminism in Spain: Dominican Critics of the Early Society of Jesus

Terence O’reilly
{"title":"The Spiritual Exercises and Illuminism in Spain: Dominican Critics of the Early Society of Jesus","authors":"Terence O’reilly","doi":"10.1163/22141332-00703002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recovery of important historical texts in the last half century has provoked a reevaluation of the features of Ignatius of Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises that have been described as “mystical” (especially their contemplative dimension and their implicit pneumatology), inviting us to reconsider the history of their composition and first reception, including the relationship between the spirituality of Ignatius to which they give expression, and the teachings of the illuminists or alumbrados. This article furthers this discussion by examining criticisms directed against the Spiritual Exercises during the last decade of Ignatius’s life by two Spanish Dominicans, Melchor Cano and Tomás de Pedroche, who found parallels between the Exercises and the theology of the illuminists. These criticisms were serious enough to affect the received interpretation of what we now call the mystical aspects of the Exercises leading up to its codification in the Official Directory of 1599, particularly regarding the place, if any, of contemplation in the lives of the laity, the role of consolation in prayer, and the experience of direct divine guidance.","PeriodicalId":225902,"journal":{"name":"The Spiritual Exercises of Saint Ignatius of Loyola","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Spiritual Exercises of Saint Ignatius of Loyola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22141332-00703002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The recovery of important historical texts in the last half century has provoked a reevaluation of the features of Ignatius of Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises that have been described as “mystical” (especially their contemplative dimension and their implicit pneumatology), inviting us to reconsider the history of their composition and first reception, including the relationship between the spirituality of Ignatius to which they give expression, and the teachings of the illuminists or alumbrados. This article furthers this discussion by examining criticisms directed against the Spiritual Exercises during the last decade of Ignatius’s life by two Spanish Dominicans, Melchor Cano and Tomás de Pedroche, who found parallels between the Exercises and the theology of the illuminists. These criticisms were serious enough to affect the received interpretation of what we now call the mystical aspects of the Exercises leading up to its codification in the Official Directory of 1599, particularly regarding the place, if any, of contemplation in the lives of the laity, the role of consolation in prayer, and the experience of direct divine guidance.
西班牙的灵性操练与光照派:早期耶稣会的多明尼加批评
在过去的半个世纪中,重要的历史文本的恢复引发了对洛约拉精神练习的伊格内修斯特征的重新评估,这些特征被描述为“神秘的”(特别是它们的沉思维度和隐含的气体学),邀请我们重新考虑它们的组成和第一次接受的历史,包括伊格内修斯的灵性表达与光明主义者或校友的教义之间的关系。这篇文章通过研究两位西班牙多米尼加人Melchor Cano和Tomás de Pedroche在伊格内修斯生命的最后十年中对精神练习的批评,进一步讨论了这一问题,他们发现了练习与光明派神学之间的相似之处。这些批评严重到足以影响人们对现在所谓的“练习”的神秘方面的理解,并最终在1599年的《官方指南》中将其编纂,特别是关于平信徒生活中沉思的地位(如果有的话),祈祷中安慰的作用,以及直接神圣指导的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信