Crowdfunding: Genesis and Comprehensive Review of Its State in Africa

Oloutchègoun Josias Lawrence Adjakou
{"title":"Crowdfunding: Genesis and Comprehensive Review of Its State in Africa","authors":"Oloutchègoun Josias Lawrence Adjakou","doi":"10.4236/OJBM.2021.92031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In developing countries, the topic of crowdfunding is still in its \ninfancy because Europe; Asia and North America have monopolized almost all the \nresearchers’ attention. Nevertheless, the number of scholars stressing the fact \nthat investigations should be conducted on the economic impact of crowdfunding \nin developing countries where financial systems are still struggling is incredibly increasing. But before getting to that point, as Gajda and Walton \nstated, “An analysis of primary and secondary data; in-depth assessment of live \nprojects and statistical analysis could provide more insight (…) how to make \ncrowdfunding more accessible to entrepreneurs in the developing world” (Gajda & Walton, 2013: p. iii). Drawing on this and the fact that none of the extant literature about \ncrowdfunding in Africa has provided statistical assessment of existing \nplatforms on the continent; how much crowdfunding has been adopted and \nsustainably implemented across various region on the continent, this paper’s \nmain goal is to depict and describe the current situation of crowdfunding in Africa. Known as proven and accepted methods \nused for growing topics in the field of entrepreneurship, this paper used \nexploratory and descriptive methods. This paper provides everyone in \nneed of clear understanding of crowdfunding’s origin; how it evolved; its level \nof penetration and use in Africa, with the necessary information. The study \ncame to conclude that in West and North Africa only 22% and 33% of the \nplatforms created in the span of 2012 to 2020 are still operating. East Africa \nand South Africa are doing far better as respectively 70% and 55% of their \ncrowdfunding platforms are still operating. The study also found that French \nSpeaking countries struggle a lot in implementing and sustaining crowdfunding platform. \nWest Africa performs very poorly as rarely the projects listed on the scarce \nplatforms still operating manage to gather more than 2% of their funding goals. \nThe study also came to the conclusion that by May 2020, 64% of the crowdfunding \noperating in Africa are foreign based.","PeriodicalId":411102,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Business and Management","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJBM.2021.92031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In developing countries, the topic of crowdfunding is still in its infancy because Europe; Asia and North America have monopolized almost all the researchers’ attention. Nevertheless, the number of scholars stressing the fact that investigations should be conducted on the economic impact of crowdfunding in developing countries where financial systems are still struggling is incredibly increasing. But before getting to that point, as Gajda and Walton stated, “An analysis of primary and secondary data; in-depth assessment of live projects and statistical analysis could provide more insight (…) how to make crowdfunding more accessible to entrepreneurs in the developing world” (Gajda & Walton, 2013: p. iii). Drawing on this and the fact that none of the extant literature about crowdfunding in Africa has provided statistical assessment of existing platforms on the continent; how much crowdfunding has been adopted and sustainably implemented across various region on the continent, this paper’s main goal is to depict and describe the current situation of crowdfunding in Africa. Known as proven and accepted methods used for growing topics in the field of entrepreneurship, this paper used exploratory and descriptive methods. This paper provides everyone in need of clear understanding of crowdfunding’s origin; how it evolved; its level of penetration and use in Africa, with the necessary information. The study came to conclude that in West and North Africa only 22% and 33% of the platforms created in the span of 2012 to 2020 are still operating. East Africa and South Africa are doing far better as respectively 70% and 55% of their crowdfunding platforms are still operating. The study also found that French Speaking countries struggle a lot in implementing and sustaining crowdfunding platform. West Africa performs very poorly as rarely the projects listed on the scarce platforms still operating manage to gather more than 2% of their funding goals. The study also came to the conclusion that by May 2020, 64% of the crowdfunding operating in Africa are foreign based.
众筹:非洲众筹的起源与现状综述
在发展中国家,众筹的话题仍处于起步阶段,因为欧洲;亚洲和北美几乎垄断了所有研究人员的注意力。然而,越来越多的学者强调,在金融体系仍处于困境的发展中国家,应该对众筹的经济影响进行调查。但在谈到这一点之前,正如Gajda和Walton所说,“对主要和次要数据的分析;对现场项目的深入评估和统计分析可以提供更多的见解(……)如何让发展中国家的企业家更容易获得众筹”(Gajda & Walton, 2013: p. iii)。基于这一点,以及关于非洲众筹的现有文献都没有提供对非洲大陆现有平台的统计评估这一事实;在非洲大陆的各个地区,众筹已经被采用和可持续实施了多少,本文的主要目标是描绘和描述非洲众筹的现状。作为公认的和公认的用于创业领域日益增长的话题的方法,本文采用了探索性和描述性的方法。本文让有需要的人对众筹的起源有一个清晰的认识;它是如何进化的;它在非洲的渗透和使用程度,并提供必要的资料。该研究得出的结论是,在西非和北非,2012年至2020年间新建的平台中,只有22%和33%仍在运营。东非和南非的情况要好得多,分别有70%和55%的众筹平台仍在运营。该研究还发现,法语国家在实施和维持众筹平台方面遇到了很多困难。西非的表现非常糟糕,在稀缺的平台上列出的项目很少能够筹集到超过目标资金2%的资金。该研究还得出结论,到2020年5月,非洲64%的众筹业务是外国的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信