Question Analysis and Answer Passage Retrieval for Opinion Question Answering Systems

Lun-Wei Ku, Yu-Ting Liang, Hsin-Hsi Chen
{"title":"Question Analysis and Answer Passage Retrieval for Opinion Question Answering Systems","authors":"Lun-Wei Ku, Yu-Ting Liang, Hsin-Hsi Chen","doi":"10.30019/IJCLCLP.200809.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Question answering systems provide an elegant way for people to access an underlying knowledge base. However, people are interested in not only factual questions, but also opinions. This paper deals with question analysis and answer passage retrieval in opinion QA systems. For question analysis, six opinion question types are defined. A two-layered framework utilizing two question type classifiers is proposed. Algorithms for these two classifiers are described. The performance achieves 87.8% in general question classification and 92.5% in opinion question classification. The question focus is detected to form a query for the information retrieval system and the question polarity is detected to retain relevant sentences which have the same polarity as the question. For answer passage retrieval, three components are introduced. Relevant sentences retrieved are further identified as to whether the focus (Focus Detection) is in a scope of opinion (Opinion Scope Identification) or not, and, if yes, whether the polarity of the scope and the polarity of the question (Polarity Detection) match with each other. The best model achieves an F-measure of 40.59% by adopting partial match for relevance detection at the level of meaningful unit. With relevance issues removed, the F-measure of the best model boosts up to 84.96%.","PeriodicalId":436300,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Comput. Linguistics Chin. Lang. Process.","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Comput. Linguistics Chin. Lang. Process.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30019/IJCLCLP.200809.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Question answering systems provide an elegant way for people to access an underlying knowledge base. However, people are interested in not only factual questions, but also opinions. This paper deals with question analysis and answer passage retrieval in opinion QA systems. For question analysis, six opinion question types are defined. A two-layered framework utilizing two question type classifiers is proposed. Algorithms for these two classifiers are described. The performance achieves 87.8% in general question classification and 92.5% in opinion question classification. The question focus is detected to form a query for the information retrieval system and the question polarity is detected to retain relevant sentences which have the same polarity as the question. For answer passage retrieval, three components are introduced. Relevant sentences retrieved are further identified as to whether the focus (Focus Detection) is in a scope of opinion (Opinion Scope Identification) or not, and, if yes, whether the polarity of the scope and the polarity of the question (Polarity Detection) match with each other. The best model achieves an F-measure of 40.59% by adopting partial match for relevance detection at the level of meaningful unit. With relevance issues removed, the F-measure of the best model boosts up to 84.96%.
意见问答系统的问题分析和答案段落检索
问答系统为人们访问底层知识库提供了一种优雅的方式。然而,人们不仅对事实问题感兴趣,而且对观点也感兴趣。本文研究了意见问答系统中的问题分析和问答段落检索。对于问题分析,定义了六种意见问题类型。提出了一个利用两个问题类型分类器的两层框架。描述了这两种分类器的算法。一般问题分类性能达到87.8%,意见问题分类性能达到92.5%。通过检测问题焦点形成信息检索系统的查询,通过检测问题极性保留与问题极性相同的相关句子。对于答案检索,引入了三个组成部分。进一步识别检索到的相关句子的焦点(focus Detection)是否在意见范围(opinion scope Identification)中,如果是,则范围的极性与问题的极性(polarity Detection)是否匹配。最佳模型在有意义单元水平上采用部分匹配进行相关性检测,f值达到40.59%。剔除相关性问题后,最佳模型的f值提升到84.96%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信