Problem of developing new theoretical models of cross-cultural interaction in the context of implementation of The new silk road initiative

M. N. Chistanov, S. S. Chistanova, T. Maslova, I. Kudryashov
{"title":"Problem of developing new theoretical models of cross-cultural interaction in the context of implementation of The new silk road initiative","authors":"M. N. Chistanov, S. S. Chistanova, T. Maslova, I. Kudryashov","doi":"10.15293/2226-3365.1801.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The authors identify difficulties in implementation of multiculturalism policy and reveal weak points in ethnic-cultural identity models dominating in social researches over the last several decades but along with it possible theoretical restrictions of the alternative models of cross-cultural interaction constructed on other ontological principles. Materials and Methods. The research is based on the ideas of new post-multicultural approach to the analysis of the interaction of cultures realizing descriptive, explanatory and predictive functions of social knowledge on the basis of methodology of systemic, activity and cultural- historical approaches in modern conditions. The methodical base of the research consists in methods of phenomenological description, interpretation, comparison, and comparative analysis of works by Russian and Foreign researchers in the sphere of ethnic-cultural identity and interactions. Results. The authors analyze evolution of ideas of ethnic identity nature and ways of settling interethnic and inter-confessional conflicts. In the conditions of crisis of the idea of multiculturalism it is possible to consider the alternative models of cross-cultural interaction: concepts of 'melting pot' and ‘salad bowl’, and also their shortcomings and restrictions. The authors reveal that the concept of geographical determinism, which has been considered as outdate, unexpectedly becomes relevant for understanding the mechanisms of cross-cultural and interfaith interaction in modern conditions. Conclusions. The authors emphasize that within the context of implementation of such transcontinental initiatives as “The New Silk road\" the China-centrist model of cross-cultural interaction could take the place of the multiculturalism model which has compromised itself. This new model leaves an ethnic component of culture out of the sphere of its attention. In conditions of changing paradigms of cross-cultural interaction, dependence of civil harmony and wellbeing on creation of dialogue of ethnic cultures, which is traditional for European philosophy, risks to become absolutely unclaimed.","PeriodicalId":226844,"journal":{"name":"Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1801.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The authors identify difficulties in implementation of multiculturalism policy and reveal weak points in ethnic-cultural identity models dominating in social researches over the last several decades but along with it possible theoretical restrictions of the alternative models of cross-cultural interaction constructed on other ontological principles. Materials and Methods. The research is based on the ideas of new post-multicultural approach to the analysis of the interaction of cultures realizing descriptive, explanatory and predictive functions of social knowledge on the basis of methodology of systemic, activity and cultural- historical approaches in modern conditions. The methodical base of the research consists in methods of phenomenological description, interpretation, comparison, and comparative analysis of works by Russian and Foreign researchers in the sphere of ethnic-cultural identity and interactions. Results. The authors analyze evolution of ideas of ethnic identity nature and ways of settling interethnic and inter-confessional conflicts. In the conditions of crisis of the idea of multiculturalism it is possible to consider the alternative models of cross-cultural interaction: concepts of 'melting pot' and ‘salad bowl’, and also their shortcomings and restrictions. The authors reveal that the concept of geographical determinism, which has been considered as outdate, unexpectedly becomes relevant for understanding the mechanisms of cross-cultural and interfaith interaction in modern conditions. Conclusions. The authors emphasize that within the context of implementation of such transcontinental initiatives as “The New Silk road" the China-centrist model of cross-cultural interaction could take the place of the multiculturalism model which has compromised itself. This new model leaves an ethnic component of culture out of the sphere of its attention. In conditions of changing paradigms of cross-cultural interaction, dependence of civil harmony and wellbeing on creation of dialogue of ethnic cultures, which is traditional for European philosophy, risks to become absolutely unclaimed.
新丝绸之路倡议背景下跨文化互动理论新模式的发展问题
介绍。作者指出了实施多元文化主义政策的困难,揭示了过去几十年在社会研究中占主导地位的种族-文化认同模型的弱点,以及基于其他本体论原则构建的跨文化互动替代模型可能存在的理论限制。材料与方法。本研究以新后多元文化方法的思想为基础,在现代条件下,以系统方法、活动方法和文化历史方法为基础,实现社会知识的描述、解释和预测功能。研究的方法基础是对俄罗斯和外国研究人员在民族文化认同和相互作用领域的作品进行现象学描述、解释、比较和比较分析的方法。结果。作者分析了民族认同本质观念的演变,以及解决民族间和教派间冲突的途径。在多元文化主义思想危机的条件下,有可能考虑跨文化互动的替代模式:“大熔炉”和“沙拉碗”的概念,以及它们的缺点和局限性。作者揭示了地理决定论的概念,被认为是过时的,意外地成为理解现代条件下跨文化和宗教间互动机制的相关因素。结论。作者强调,在实施“新丝绸之路”等跨大陆倡议的背景下,中国中心主义的跨文化互动模式可以取代已经妥协的多元文化主义模式。这种新模式将文化的种族成分排除在其关注范围之外。在跨文化互动范式不断变化的条件下,公民和谐与福祉依赖于民族文化对话的创造,这是欧洲哲学的传统,有可能变得完全无人认养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信