Pessimistic Deadline Ceiling Protocol: a concurrency control protocol under earliest deadline first scheduling

Joo-Yong Kim, K. Koh
{"title":"Pessimistic Deadline Ceiling Protocol: a concurrency control protocol under earliest deadline first scheduling","authors":"Joo-Yong Kim, K. Koh","doi":"10.1109/EMWRTS.1995.514296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Priority inversion is one of the major sources which makes the real-time system unpredictable. The Stack Resource Policy (SRP) and the Dynamic Priority Ceiling Protocol (Dpcp) are two representative protocols that solve the priority inversion problem under earliest deadline first scheduling (EDF). Dpcp yields better performance but incurs more overhead than SRP. We propose a new algorithm called the Pessimistic Priority Ceiling Protocol (PDCP). PDCP is based on the notions of the inactive task and the pessimistic deadline, which are defined in the paper. PDCP uses the dynamic value for the priority to access a shared resource, and uses the static value for determining the resource ceiling. PDCP yields comparable performance with Dpcp yet incurs less overhead than Dpcp. When compared to SRP, PDCP yields better performance at a slightly higher overhead. In particular, PDCP has the same overhead as SRP if the depth of the resource nesting is 1.","PeriodicalId":156501,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Seventh Euromicro Workshop on Real-Time Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Seventh Euromicro Workshop on Real-Time Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMWRTS.1995.514296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Priority inversion is one of the major sources which makes the real-time system unpredictable. The Stack Resource Policy (SRP) and the Dynamic Priority Ceiling Protocol (Dpcp) are two representative protocols that solve the priority inversion problem under earliest deadline first scheduling (EDF). Dpcp yields better performance but incurs more overhead than SRP. We propose a new algorithm called the Pessimistic Priority Ceiling Protocol (PDCP). PDCP is based on the notions of the inactive task and the pessimistic deadline, which are defined in the paper. PDCP uses the dynamic value for the priority to access a shared resource, and uses the static value for determining the resource ceiling. PDCP yields comparable performance with Dpcp yet incurs less overhead than Dpcp. When compared to SRP, PDCP yields better performance at a slightly higher overhead. In particular, PDCP has the same overhead as SRP if the depth of the resource nesting is 1.
悲观期限上限协议:最早期限优先调度的并发控制协议
优先级反转是造成实时系统不可预测的主要原因之一。栈资源策略(SRP)和动态优先级上限协议(Dpcp)是解决最早截止日期优先调度(EDF)下优先级反转问题的两个代表性协议。Dpcp产生更好的性能,但比SRP产生更多的开销。提出了一种新的算法,称为悲观优先级上限协议(PDCP)。PDCP是在定义了非活动任务和最悲观截止日期概念的基础上提出的。PDCP使用动态值来确定访问共享资源的优先级,使用静态值来确定资源上限。PDCP产生与Dpcp相当的性能,但产生的开销比Dpcp少。与SRP相比,PDCP在稍高的开销下产生更好的性能。特别是,如果资源嵌套深度为1,则PDCP具有与SRP相同的开销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信