Comparison of target detection algorithms using adaptive background models

Daniela Hall, J. Nascimento, P. Ribeiro, E. Andrade, Plinio Moreno, S. Pesnel, T. List, R. Emonet, R. Fisher, J. S. Victor, J. Crowley
{"title":"Comparison of target detection algorithms using adaptive background models","authors":"Daniela Hall, J. Nascimento, P. Ribeiro, E. Andrade, Plinio Moreno, S. Pesnel, T. List, R. Emonet, R. Fisher, J. S. Victor, J. Crowley","doi":"10.1109/VSPETS.2005.1570905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares the performance of target detectors based on adaptive background differencing on public benchmark data. Five state of the art methods are described. The performance is evaluated using state of the art measures with respect to ground truth. The original points are the comparison to hand labelled ground truth and the evaluation on a large database. The simpler methods LOTS and SGM are more appropriate to the particular task as MGM using a more complex background model.","PeriodicalId":435841,"journal":{"name":"2005 IEEE International Workshop on Visual Surveillance and Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"124","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2005 IEEE International Workshop on Visual Surveillance and Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VSPETS.2005.1570905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 124

Abstract

This article compares the performance of target detectors based on adaptive background differencing on public benchmark data. Five state of the art methods are described. The performance is evaluated using state of the art measures with respect to ground truth. The original points are the comparison to hand labelled ground truth and the evaluation on a large database. The simpler methods LOTS and SGM are more appropriate to the particular task as MGM using a more complex background model.
基于自适应背景模型的目标检测算法比较
本文在公共基准数据上比较了基于自适应背景差分的目标检测器的性能。描述了五种最先进的方法。性能是用最先进的测量方法来评估的。原始点是与手工标记的地面真值的比较和对大型数据库的评估。简单的方法LOTS和SGM更适合于MGM使用更复杂的背景模型的特定任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信