International Underwater Cultural Heritage Governance – Past Doubts and Current Challenges

Eden Sarid
{"title":"International Underwater Cultural Heritage Governance – Past Doubts and Current Challenges","authors":"Eden Sarid","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2826845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The international legal regime aimed at the protection and governance of underwater cultural heritage is facing substantial strife. Unauthorized salvage and looting are a continuing threat. Alongside these, current challenges include disputes between post-colonies and post-colonial powers over title to sunken vessels, lack of a global policy for the protection of underwater gravesites, and the exploitation of underwater cultural heritage as a means to claim disputed territory. Present times also mark a considerable passing of time since the signing (2001) and entry into force (2009) of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. When the Convention was signed, notable maritime powers were concerned that it erodes international law principles, particularly, marine jurisdiction and state-owned vessels’ immunity. Therefore, they have not joined the Convention. The article revisits the maritime powers’ reservations and maintains that in practice these concerns did not materialize. It then demonstrates the Convention’s competence to face the current challenges to international underwater cultural heritage governance. The article suggests that despite several drawbacks, the Convention is the best international law apparatus to govern and protect the underwater cultural heritage.","PeriodicalId":325917,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2826845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The international legal regime aimed at the protection and governance of underwater cultural heritage is facing substantial strife. Unauthorized salvage and looting are a continuing threat. Alongside these, current challenges include disputes between post-colonies and post-colonial powers over title to sunken vessels, lack of a global policy for the protection of underwater gravesites, and the exploitation of underwater cultural heritage as a means to claim disputed territory. Present times also mark a considerable passing of time since the signing (2001) and entry into force (2009) of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. When the Convention was signed, notable maritime powers were concerned that it erodes international law principles, particularly, marine jurisdiction and state-owned vessels’ immunity. Therefore, they have not joined the Convention. The article revisits the maritime powers’ reservations and maintains that in practice these concerns did not materialize. It then demonstrates the Convention’s competence to face the current challenges to international underwater cultural heritage governance. The article suggests that despite several drawbacks, the Convention is the best international law apparatus to govern and protect the underwater cultural heritage.
国际水下文化遗产治理——过去的疑惑和当前的挑战
旨在保护和治理水下文化遗产的国际法律制度正面临着巨大的冲突。未经授权的打捞和抢劫是一个持续的威胁。除此之外,当前的挑战还包括后殖民地和后殖民国家之间关于沉船所有权的争端,缺乏保护水下墓地的全球政策,以及利用水下文化遗产作为主张有争议领土的手段。自联合国教科文组织《保护水下文化遗产公约》签署(2001年)并生效(2009年)以来,时间已经过去了相当长的一段时间。签署《公约》时,著名的海洋大国担心,它侵蚀了国际法原则,特别是海洋管辖权和国有船舶的豁免。因此,它们没有加入《公约》。这篇文章回顾了海洋大国的保留意见,并认为在实践中这些担忧并未成为现实。这表明《公约》有能力应对当前国际水下文化遗产治理面临的挑战。文章认为,尽管存在一些缺陷,《公约》仍是管理和保护水下文化遗产的最佳国际法律机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信