Development of the Legal Regulation of Punishment in the Form of Fine According to the Criminal Code of Ukraine of 2001

A. Gornostay
{"title":"Development of the Legal Regulation of Punishment in the Form of Fine According to the Criminal Code of Ukraine of 2001","authors":"A. Gornostay","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.159.268089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This topic is relevant because in practice the application of such punishment as a fine is very common, and it has many problematic aspects of the purpose. The purpose of the article is the genesis of the criminal law regulation of punishment in the form of a fine in the current Criminal Code of Ukraine and the analysis of the changes that have taken place over the past 20 years. To achieve this goal, the author used dialectical, historical and comparative methods. These methods helped to investigate the processes of formation and development of the institution of the fine in the Criminal Code of Ukraine of 2001. In the article, the author analyzes the norms of the criminal legislation of Ukraine, which regulate the concept of a fine and the order of its calculation, the maximum and minimum size of the fine. The author emphasizes that the prevalence of the fine in legislation and judicial practice, the methods of its calculation, its size, the grounds and conditions of its application are not constant and are conditioned by socio-economic, political, criminological and legal factors of specific historical periods. This is especially relevant for Ukraine. Current criminal law establishes a fine as the mildest type of punishment among other types of punishment, but this is a controversial provision. The author emphasizes that the legislator hopes for a fine as an effective form of punishment for persons who have committed certain criminal offenses, primarily corruption and against property. At the same time, it was emphasized that regular changes in the rules on fines, especially regarding the size of this type of punishment, are not without significant drawbacks. In this work, they are outlined. Certain positions regarding their elimination have been expressed.  Possible options for reforming regulatory provisions are proposed.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.159.268089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This topic is relevant because in practice the application of such punishment as a fine is very common, and it has many problematic aspects of the purpose. The purpose of the article is the genesis of the criminal law regulation of punishment in the form of a fine in the current Criminal Code of Ukraine and the analysis of the changes that have taken place over the past 20 years. To achieve this goal, the author used dialectical, historical and comparative methods. These methods helped to investigate the processes of formation and development of the institution of the fine in the Criminal Code of Ukraine of 2001. In the article, the author analyzes the norms of the criminal legislation of Ukraine, which regulate the concept of a fine and the order of its calculation, the maximum and minimum size of the fine. The author emphasizes that the prevalence of the fine in legislation and judicial practice, the methods of its calculation, its size, the grounds and conditions of its application are not constant and are conditioned by socio-economic, political, criminological and legal factors of specific historical periods. This is especially relevant for Ukraine. Current criminal law establishes a fine as the mildest type of punishment among other types of punishment, but this is a controversial provision. The author emphasizes that the legislator hopes for a fine as an effective form of punishment for persons who have committed certain criminal offenses, primarily corruption and against property. At the same time, it was emphasized that regular changes in the rules on fines, especially regarding the size of this type of punishment, are not without significant drawbacks. In this work, they are outlined. Certain positions regarding their elimination have been expressed.  Possible options for reforming regulatory provisions are proposed.
2001年《乌克兰刑法典》中罚金形式处罚法律规制的发展
这个话题是相关的,因为在实践中,像罚款这样的惩罚的应用是非常普遍的,它的目的有很多问题。本文的目的是探讨现行《乌克兰刑法》中罚金形式的刑法规定的起源,并分析过去20年来所发生的变化。为了达到这一目的,作者运用了辩证法、历史法和比较法。这些方法有助于调查2001年乌克兰刑法中罚款制度的形成和发展过程。本文分析了乌克兰刑事立法规范对罚金概念、罚金计算顺序、罚金最高限额和最低限额的规定。作者强调,在立法和司法实践中,罚金的普遍程度、计算方法、数额、适用的理由和条件并不是一成不变的,而是受到特定历史时期的社会经济、政治、犯罪学和法律因素的制约。这对乌克兰尤其重要。现行刑法将罚金规定为各种刑罚中最轻的一种,但这是一个有争议的规定。作者强调,立法者希望将罚款作为对犯有某些刑事罪行,主要是腐败和侵犯财产的人的一种有效惩罚形式。同时,有人强调,定期修改罚款规则,特别是关于这类惩罚的数额,并非没有重大的缺点。在这项工作中,概述了它们。已经对取消这些武器表示了某些立场。提出了改革监管规定的可能方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信