{"title":"A clinical pathway for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Impact on costs and clinical outcome.","authors":"Wei-Chun Chang, Cheng-Chieh Lin","doi":"10.1097/01.OGX.0000079650.86551.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo evaluate the cost of and clinical outcome of implementing a clinical pathway for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nA retrospective study of the case records of patients who underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy before (May-December 1997) and after (January 1998-March 1999) implementation of a clinical pathway. Data regarding resource consumption and clinical outcome represented by 10 clinical indicators were collected. Student's t test and the chi 2 test were used, as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at P = .05.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAfter implementation of the laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy clinical pathway, the average total fee decreased significantly, by 8.1% (P = .03), the average inpatient drug fee decreased by 50.6% (P < .01), and the laboratory fee dropped by 56.2% (P < .01). Furthermore, the length of hospital stay significantly decreased, from 6.90 to 4.08 days (P < .01); the average operation time decreased by 24.8% (P < .01); and the average anesthesia time decreased by 21.6% (P < .01). The pre-clinical pathway and post-clinical pathway complication rate did not differ statistically, but the rate of initiating intravenous antibiotic injections > 48 hours following surgery decreased by 76.2% in the clinical pathway group (P = .02).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nImplementation of a clinical pathway for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy can improve health care outcomes by decreasing length of hospital stay and admission fees and by maintaining quality of care. The clinical pathway is a good policy for maintaining cost containment and high-quality patient care.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"49 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OGX.0000079650.86551.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the cost of and clinical outcome of implementing a clinical pathway for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
STUDY DESIGN
A retrospective study of the case records of patients who underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy before (May-December 1997) and after (January 1998-March 1999) implementation of a clinical pathway. Data regarding resource consumption and clinical outcome represented by 10 clinical indicators were collected. Student's t test and the chi 2 test were used, as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at P = .05.
RESULTS
After implementation of the laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy clinical pathway, the average total fee decreased significantly, by 8.1% (P = .03), the average inpatient drug fee decreased by 50.6% (P < .01), and the laboratory fee dropped by 56.2% (P < .01). Furthermore, the length of hospital stay significantly decreased, from 6.90 to 4.08 days (P < .01); the average operation time decreased by 24.8% (P < .01); and the average anesthesia time decreased by 21.6% (P < .01). The pre-clinical pathway and post-clinical pathway complication rate did not differ statistically, but the rate of initiating intravenous antibiotic injections > 48 hours following surgery decreased by 76.2% in the clinical pathway group (P = .02).
CONCLUSION
Implementation of a clinical pathway for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy can improve health care outcomes by decreasing length of hospital stay and admission fees and by maintaining quality of care. The clinical pathway is a good policy for maintaining cost containment and high-quality patient care.