Interactive query formulation

Nina Wacholder
{"title":"Interactive query formulation","authors":"Nina Wacholder","doi":"10.1002/aris.2011.1440450111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Query formulation (QF) is the stage of the interactive information access process in which an information seeker translates an information need into a query and submits the query to an information access system such as a search engine (e.g., Google) or a library database (e.g., Factiva or PubMed). The system performs some computation to match the query with the documents most likely to be relevant to the query and returns a ranked list of relevant documents to the information seeker. QF is a key component of the information access process (Bates, 1986; Belkin, Cool, Croft, & Callan, 1993; Blair & Maron, 1985; Hall, Negus, & Dancy, 1972; Kuhlthau, 1991; Marchionini, 1995; Oddy, 1977). It is also very hard (Beghtol, 1986; Belkin, Oddy, & Brooks, 1991, 1982; Swanson, 1960; Taylor, 1968; ter Hofstede, Proper, & van der Weide, 1996). The difficulty of QF is an impediment to development of optimally effective systems—if only users would formulate better queries, information retrieval systems could do a much better job of returning relevant documents. In addition to being difficult to perform, QF is difficult to study. There are at least three reasons. First, the QF process takes place inside the human mind. The user’s mental representation of the information need and the process of translating that need into a query are not visible to outside observers. Selfreporting, although useful for studying some aspects of information seeking, is of limited use for studying mental representations and cognitive processes that take place below the level of consciousness (Wilson, 1994). Therefore the QF process must be studied indirectly, by analysis of queries or by other externally observable behaviors. Second, the impact of user characteristics on QF is hard to isolate. It is very difficult to assess the effectiveness of the product of QF—the queries—outside of the context of particular users. For example, in her review of literature on the impact of domain expertise, Wildemuth (2004) concludes that it is possible to generalize about the impact of domain expertise on the vocabulary used in the queries but not about the impact of domain expertise on effectiveness of results. Designing CHAPTER 4","PeriodicalId":55509,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Information Science and Technology","volume":"45 1","pages":"157-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/aris.2011.1440450111","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aris.2011.1440450111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Query formulation (QF) is the stage of the interactive information access process in which an information seeker translates an information need into a query and submits the query to an information access system such as a search engine (e.g., Google) or a library database (e.g., Factiva or PubMed). The system performs some computation to match the query with the documents most likely to be relevant to the query and returns a ranked list of relevant documents to the information seeker. QF is a key component of the information access process (Bates, 1986; Belkin, Cool, Croft, & Callan, 1993; Blair & Maron, 1985; Hall, Negus, & Dancy, 1972; Kuhlthau, 1991; Marchionini, 1995; Oddy, 1977). It is also very hard (Beghtol, 1986; Belkin, Oddy, & Brooks, 1991, 1982; Swanson, 1960; Taylor, 1968; ter Hofstede, Proper, & van der Weide, 1996). The difficulty of QF is an impediment to development of optimally effective systems—if only users would formulate better queries, information retrieval systems could do a much better job of returning relevant documents. In addition to being difficult to perform, QF is difficult to study. There are at least three reasons. First, the QF process takes place inside the human mind. The user’s mental representation of the information need and the process of translating that need into a query are not visible to outside observers. Selfreporting, although useful for studying some aspects of information seeking, is of limited use for studying mental representations and cognitive processes that take place below the level of consciousness (Wilson, 1994). Therefore the QF process must be studied indirectly, by analysis of queries or by other externally observable behaviors. Second, the impact of user characteristics on QF is hard to isolate. It is very difficult to assess the effectiveness of the product of QF—the queries—outside of the context of particular users. For example, in her review of literature on the impact of domain expertise, Wildemuth (2004) concludes that it is possible to generalize about the impact of domain expertise on the vocabulary used in the queries but not about the impact of domain expertise on effectiveness of results. Designing CHAPTER 4

Abstract Image

交互式查询公式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信