An informatics tool for class-to-class planning and academic-load evaluation

Liliana Huallcca, G. Muñoz, José Mellado, Daniel Vega-Araya, Manuel Villalobos-Cid
{"title":"An informatics tool for class-to-class planning and academic-load evaluation","authors":"Liliana Huallcca, G. Muñoz, José Mellado, Daniel Vega-Araya, Manuel Villalobos-Cid","doi":"10.1109/SCCC51225.2020.9281221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given its importance with regards to the health and performance of the students, the evaluation and control of the academic load have come to form part of a critical component of the educational process. Several universities around the world have performed studies evaluating their programs by contrasting the planned and effective academic load using a credit system. Most of them have used strategies based on interviews, surveys, questionnaires and logbooks to quantify the effective load. In addition, it has become necessary to define academic programs with activities and load planned according to a uniform criterion. To evaluate the programs of our department, we propose a strategy based on three stages: (1) the designing of an informatic tool which allows academics to plan the class-to-class activities of each course by considering load, (2) holding a set of meetings with academics and students to discuss the planned and effective load of the courses, and (3) a study of the balance of the load between the different weeks of the semesters. In this manuscript, we describe the first stage of the strategy associated with the informatics tool.","PeriodicalId":117157,"journal":{"name":"2020 39th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 39th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCCC51225.2020.9281221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given its importance with regards to the health and performance of the students, the evaluation and control of the academic load have come to form part of a critical component of the educational process. Several universities around the world have performed studies evaluating their programs by contrasting the planned and effective academic load using a credit system. Most of them have used strategies based on interviews, surveys, questionnaires and logbooks to quantify the effective load. In addition, it has become necessary to define academic programs with activities and load planned according to a uniform criterion. To evaluate the programs of our department, we propose a strategy based on three stages: (1) the designing of an informatic tool which allows academics to plan the class-to-class activities of each course by considering load, (2) holding a set of meetings with academics and students to discuss the planned and effective load of the courses, and (3) a study of the balance of the load between the different weeks of the semesters. In this manuscript, we describe the first stage of the strategy associated with the informatics tool.
一个用于班级间规划和学术负荷评估的信息学工具
鉴于学业负担的评估和控制对学生的健康和表现的重要性,它已成为教育过程的一个关键组成部分。世界各地的几所大学已经进行了研究,通过比较计划和有效的学分制学术负荷来评估他们的课程。他们大多采用基于访谈、调查、问卷调查和日志的策略来量化有效负荷。此外,有必要根据统一的标准来定义具有活动和负荷计划的学术课程。为了评估我们系的课程,我们提出了一个基于三个阶段的策略:(1)设计一个信息工具,使学者能够根据负荷来计划每门课程的课堂活动;(2)与学者和学生举行一系列会议,讨论计划和有效的课程负荷;(3)研究学期不同周之间的负荷平衡。在这份手稿中,我们描述了与信息学工具相关的战略的第一阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信