“Comparison Study between Conservative Treatment and Nerve Block Treatment in Foot Pain”

D. Shihab, Dr. Khaled Ali Khaleel, Dr. Nibras Sameer Hameed, Dr. Mortada Jubara, Dr. Zaid Al-Attar
{"title":"“Comparison Study between Conservative Treatment and Nerve Block Treatment in Foot Pain”","authors":"D. Shihab, Dr. Khaled Ali Khaleel, Dr. Nibras Sameer Hameed, Dr. Mortada Jubara, Dr. Zaid Al-Attar","doi":"10.36349/easjacc.2022.v04i02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Ultrasound guidance nerve block in foot pain management is a new method in management of foot pain. It is simple, safe and cheap. We did this trial to compare the pain scores during both rest and activity and the functional ability after doing nerves block in comparison to patients who received non steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (conservative treatment). Materials and methods: We choose 90 patients in this double blind study, all are suffering of foot pain. Their ages ranging between35 and 80years, their weight ranging between 50 and 105 and their VAS pain scores between 6 and 9. We divided them into 2 groups, first group which has 45 patients who received NSAID only while the second group which also contain 45 patients who underwent nerve block. Results: The intensity of pain using VAS pain scores was small in the nerve block group after 6months, 1 year and 2 years in comparison with first group. The function scores of foot using American orthopedics of foot and ankle society scores (AOAFS) also was better in the second group (nerve block group). Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance ankle nerves block is better than using conservative anti-inflammatory drugs in reducing pain scores and improve the function capacity of the patients in patients with foot pain.","PeriodicalId":347630,"journal":{"name":"EAS Journal of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAS Journal of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36349/easjacc.2022.v04i02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Ultrasound guidance nerve block in foot pain management is a new method in management of foot pain. It is simple, safe and cheap. We did this trial to compare the pain scores during both rest and activity and the functional ability after doing nerves block in comparison to patients who received non steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (conservative treatment). Materials and methods: We choose 90 patients in this double blind study, all are suffering of foot pain. Their ages ranging between35 and 80years, their weight ranging between 50 and 105 and their VAS pain scores between 6 and 9. We divided them into 2 groups, first group which has 45 patients who received NSAID only while the second group which also contain 45 patients who underwent nerve block. Results: The intensity of pain using VAS pain scores was small in the nerve block group after 6months, 1 year and 2 years in comparison with first group. The function scores of foot using American orthopedics of foot and ankle society scores (AOAFS) also was better in the second group (nerve block group). Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance ankle nerves block is better than using conservative anti-inflammatory drugs in reducing pain scores and improve the function capacity of the patients in patients with foot pain.
《保守治疗与神经阻滞治疗足部疼痛的比较研究》
目的:超声引导神经阻滞治疗足部疼痛是治疗足部疼痛的一种新方法。它简单、安全、便宜。我们做这项试验是为了比较休息和活动期间的疼痛评分以及神经阻滞后的功能能力,与接受非类固醇抗炎药物(保守治疗)的患者进行比较。材料与方法:选择90例足部疼痛患者进行双盲研究。他们的年龄在35到80岁之间,体重在50到105之间,VAS疼痛评分在6到9之间。我们将他们分为两组,第一组有45名患者只接受了非甾体抗炎药,第二组也有45名患者接受了神经阻滞。结果:神经阻滞组术后6个月、1年、2年的疼痛强度均低于第一组。第二组(神经阻滞组)采用美式足部矫形术及踝关节社会评分(AOAFS)进行足部功能评分也较好。结论:超声引导踝关节神经阻滞在降低足部疼痛评分和改善患者功能能力方面优于保守性消炎药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信