Formalizing prioritized consistency management in requirement engineering

K. Satoh
{"title":"Formalizing prioritized consistency management in requirement engineering","authors":"K. Satoh","doi":"10.1109/ISPSE.2000.913237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proposes a method of consistency management for a logical specification with priority. When we add or delete some information to/from the original specification, we sometimes encounter \"inconsistency\". We often try to fix such inconsistency by revising the specification minimally. Moreover, we sometimes know that a certain part of the specification should be changed in preference to the other parts, because the part is less important than the others or the part allows more exceptions than the others. In this paper, we formalize this activity by abduction. We introduce prioritized hypotheses expressing deleting and adding of some part of specification, and we translate a specification into an abductive logic program which is used to compute a prioritized, minimally revised specification. We then show an application of this formalization to module reconfiguration.","PeriodicalId":170375,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Symposium on Principles of Software Evolution","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Symposium on Principles of Software Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPSE.2000.913237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proposes a method of consistency management for a logical specification with priority. When we add or delete some information to/from the original specification, we sometimes encounter "inconsistency". We often try to fix such inconsistency by revising the specification minimally. Moreover, we sometimes know that a certain part of the specification should be changed in preference to the other parts, because the part is less important than the others or the part allows more exceptions than the others. In this paper, we formalize this activity by abduction. We introduce prioritized hypotheses expressing deleting and adding of some part of specification, and we translate a specification into an abductive logic program which is used to compute a prioritized, minimally revised specification. We then show an application of this formalization to module reconfiguration.
在需求工程中形式化优先级一致性管理
提出了一种优先级逻辑规范的一致性管理方法。当我们在原始规范中添加或删除一些信息时,我们有时会遇到“不一致”。我们经常试图通过最小限度地修改规范来解决这种不一致。此外,我们有时知道规范的某一部分应该优先于其他部分进行更改,因为该部分不如其他部分重要,或者该部分比其他部分允许更多例外。在本文中,我们通过溯因形式化了这一活动。我们引入了表示规范中某些部分的删除和添加的优先假设,并将规范转换为可溯逻辑程序,该程序用于计算优先级,最小修改的规范。然后,我们将展示这种形式化在模块重构中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信