{"title":"Horizontal and Vertical Regulatory Competition in EU Company Law: The Case of the European Private Company (SPE)","authors":"M. Eckardt, Wolfgang Kerber","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2307427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the Centros decision of the European Court of Justice in 1999, the regime of corporate laws in Europe has evolved in a fundamental way. Although it is rather incomplete and imperfect, a two-level system of corporate laws has emerged. It is characterized by a considerable degree of free choice of law. This opens up the possibility of horizontal regulatory competition between the company laws of the Member States. With the draft regulation on the European Private Company (SPE) an additional legal form tailored to the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is proposed. We analyse whether the introduction of such a supranational European legal form for limited liability companies can be recommended from the perspective of the economic theory of legal federalism. To this end we present a general theoretical framework for studying centralisation/harmonisation vs. decentralisation of legal rules and regulations in regard to company laws within the European Union. Our analysis of the empirical evidence on horizontal regulatory competition as well as on the advantages and problems of the introduction of such an additional legal form for SMEs shows clearly that it might render many benefits without considerable disadvantages when compared with the existing situation of only horizontal competition between the legal forms of the Member States.","PeriodicalId":171289,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2307427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Since the Centros decision of the European Court of Justice in 1999, the regime of corporate laws in Europe has evolved in a fundamental way. Although it is rather incomplete and imperfect, a two-level system of corporate laws has emerged. It is characterized by a considerable degree of free choice of law. This opens up the possibility of horizontal regulatory competition between the company laws of the Member States. With the draft regulation on the European Private Company (SPE) an additional legal form tailored to the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is proposed. We analyse whether the introduction of such a supranational European legal form for limited liability companies can be recommended from the perspective of the economic theory of legal federalism. To this end we present a general theoretical framework for studying centralisation/harmonisation vs. decentralisation of legal rules and regulations in regard to company laws within the European Union. Our analysis of the empirical evidence on horizontal regulatory competition as well as on the advantages and problems of the introduction of such an additional legal form for SMEs shows clearly that it might render many benefits without considerable disadvantages when compared with the existing situation of only horizontal competition between the legal forms of the Member States.
自1999年欧洲法院(European Court of Justice)对Centros案作出裁决以来,欧洲的公司法制度发生了根本性的演变。虽然尚不完善,但已经形成了一个双层公司法体系。它的特点是有相当程度的法律自由选择。这开辟了成员国公司法之间横向监管竞争的可能性。欧洲私营公司(SPE)法规草案提出了一种针对中小型企业(SMEs)需求的额外法律形式。我们从法律联邦制的经济理论角度分析了欧洲引入这种超国家的有限责任公司法律形式是否值得推荐。为此,我们提出了一个通用的理论框架,用于研究欧盟公司法中法律规则和法规的集中/协调与分散。我们对横向监管竞争的经验证据以及为中小企业引入这种额外法律形式的优势和问题的分析清楚地表明,与成员国法律形式之间只有横向竞争的现有情况相比,它可能带来许多好处而没有相当大的缺点。