Differentiated Instruction in Improving Senior High School Students’ Reading Comprehension Level

M. Jufrianto, Rahyuni, Saiful Gaffar, Fitri Amaliah Akbal, Ahmad Putra Pratama, A. Amir
{"title":"Differentiated Instruction in Improving Senior High School Students’ Reading Comprehension Level","authors":"M. Jufrianto, Rahyuni, Saiful Gaffar, Fitri Amaliah Akbal, Ahmad Putra Pratama, A. Amir","doi":"10.32996/jlds.2023.3.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigated the effectiveness of using differentiated instruction (DI) on grade 11 senior high school students’ reading comprehension throughout the academic year 2021–2022. It aims to identify the reading comprehension levels of the control and experimental groups in the pre-test, and post-test gained results, determine whether there is a significant difference in the reading comprehension levels gained from the control and experimental groups, and pinpoint the benefits and drawbacks of using this strategy. A quasi-experimental was used as a method to carry out the investigation. 142 senior high school students in Grade 11 from UPT SMA Negeri 3 Takalar served as the respondents. The results from the pre-test and post-test, an observation in the classroom, the survey, and the researcher's notes are used as the data sources. The basic method of understanding, synthesizing, interpreting, and re-analyzing was used to describe the qualitative data in order to decide common topics. Strengths and disadvantages of DI were identified based on observations made in the class, the survey, and the reflection. Statistical analysis showed a substantial difference between pre-test results and post-test results despite the observed and experienced difficulties.","PeriodicalId":445152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning and Development Studies","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning and Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/jlds.2023.3.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigated the effectiveness of using differentiated instruction (DI) on grade 11 senior high school students’ reading comprehension throughout the academic year 2021–2022. It aims to identify the reading comprehension levels of the control and experimental groups in the pre-test, and post-test gained results, determine whether there is a significant difference in the reading comprehension levels gained from the control and experimental groups, and pinpoint the benefits and drawbacks of using this strategy. A quasi-experimental was used as a method to carry out the investigation. 142 senior high school students in Grade 11 from UPT SMA Negeri 3 Takalar served as the respondents. The results from the pre-test and post-test, an observation in the classroom, the survey, and the researcher's notes are used as the data sources. The basic method of understanding, synthesizing, interpreting, and re-analyzing was used to describe the qualitative data in order to decide common topics. Strengths and disadvantages of DI were identified based on observations made in the class, the survey, and the reflection. Statistical analysis showed a substantial difference between pre-test results and post-test results despite the observed and experienced difficulties.
差别化教学在提高高中生阅读理解水平中的作用
本研究考察了2021-2022学年,差异化教学对高二学生阅读理解能力的影响。旨在确定对照组和实验组在测试前和测试后的阅读理解水平,确定对照组和实验组的阅读理解水平是否存在显著差异,并明确使用该策略的利弊。采用准实验方法进行研究。以塔克拉拉邦UPT SMA Negeri 3高三年级142名学生为调查对象。数据来源为前测和后测结果、课堂观察、调查和研究者笔记。采用理解、综合、解释、再分析的基本方法对定性数据进行描述,以确定共同主题。根据课堂上的观察、调查和反思,确定了DI的优点和缺点。统计分析显示,尽管观察到和经历了困难,但测试前结果和测试后结果之间存在实质性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信