Facilitating Equitable Subacute-to-Home Transitions for Patients Receiving Palliative and/or End-of-Life Care: A Literature Review

Madeline McCoy, Ladees Al Hafi, Ariane Downar, Taylor Shorting, Krystal Kehoe MacLeod, S. Bush, A. Wills, G. Lalumière, J. Rice, S. Isenberg
{"title":"Facilitating Equitable Subacute-to-Home Transitions for Patients Receiving Palliative and/or End-of-Life Care: A Literature Review","authors":"Madeline McCoy, Ladees Al Hafi, Ariane Downar, Taylor Shorting, Krystal Kehoe MacLeod, S. Bush, A. Wills, G. Lalumière, J. Rice, S. Isenberg","doi":"10.15273/hpj.v3i2.11589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: As people in subacute facilities approach the end of life, the focus of their care often shifts to comfort as they seek to return home. Interventions that aim to improve hospital-to-home transitions do not generally focus on subacute care. Objective: To summarize the existing literature on subacute-to-home transitions for individuals receiving palliative care near the end of life, and to explore whether these interventions are targeted toward marginalized groups to improve their transition experience. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, HealthSTAR, and Cochrane Library electronic databases using terms related to end of life, palliative care, and transitions from subacute facilities to home. We identified 896 records and included 29 articles, 11 of which were intervention articles. We searched the 11 intervention articles for equity stratifiers. Results: Of the 29 included articles, four addressed transitions for end-of-life populations, three discussed family caregiver perspectives, and 11 were intervention studies, including regular home visit follow-ups, individualized transition care plans, and an individualized intervention with an advanced practice nurse. Subacute-to-home interventions showed positive outcomes such as reduced risk of hospital readmissions, reduced length of stays, and improved functional status. However, study limitations included small sample sizes, inconsistent definitions of outcomes, and incompletion due to COVID-19. No studies focused on marginalized groups. Conclusion/Discussion: While there was some literature supporting targeted interventions for subacute-to-home transitions for those receiving palliative care or end-of-life care, the included interventions did not target marginalized groups. Further research in these areas is required. ","PeriodicalId":302892,"journal":{"name":"Healthy Populations Journal","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthy Populations Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/hpj.v3i2.11589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As people in subacute facilities approach the end of life, the focus of their care often shifts to comfort as they seek to return home. Interventions that aim to improve hospital-to-home transitions do not generally focus on subacute care. Objective: To summarize the existing literature on subacute-to-home transitions for individuals receiving palliative care near the end of life, and to explore whether these interventions are targeted toward marginalized groups to improve their transition experience. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, HealthSTAR, and Cochrane Library electronic databases using terms related to end of life, palliative care, and transitions from subacute facilities to home. We identified 896 records and included 29 articles, 11 of which were intervention articles. We searched the 11 intervention articles for equity stratifiers. Results: Of the 29 included articles, four addressed transitions for end-of-life populations, three discussed family caregiver perspectives, and 11 were intervention studies, including regular home visit follow-ups, individualized transition care plans, and an individualized intervention with an advanced practice nurse. Subacute-to-home interventions showed positive outcomes such as reduced risk of hospital readmissions, reduced length of stays, and improved functional status. However, study limitations included small sample sizes, inconsistent definitions of outcomes, and incompletion due to COVID-19. No studies focused on marginalized groups. Conclusion/Discussion: While there was some literature supporting targeted interventions for subacute-to-home transitions for those receiving palliative care or end-of-life care, the included interventions did not target marginalized groups. Further research in these areas is required. 
促进接受姑息治疗和/或临终关怀的患者公平的亚急性到家庭的过渡:文献综述
随着亚急性医疗机构中的患者接近生命终点,他们的护理重点往往转向安慰,因为他们寻求回家。旨在改善从医院到家庭过渡的干预措施通常不侧重于亚急性护理。目的:总结现有的关于临终前接受姑息治疗的亚急性到家庭过渡的文献,并探讨这些干预措施是否针对边缘群体,以改善他们的过渡体验。方法:我们检索MEDLINE、Embase、HealthSTAR和Cochrane图书馆电子数据库,使用与生命终结、姑息治疗和从亚急性设施到家庭的过渡相关的术语。纳入文献29篇,其中11篇为干预文献。我们检索了11篇干预文章中的公平分层因素。结果:在纳入的29篇文章中,4篇涉及临终人群的过渡,3篇讨论家庭照顾者的观点,11篇是干预研究,包括定期家访随访、个性化过渡护理计划和由高级执业护士进行的个性化干预。亚急性到家干预显示出积极的结果,如降低再入院风险、缩短住院时间和改善功能状态。然而,研究的局限性包括样本量小、结果定义不一致以及COVID-19导致的不完整。没有针对边缘群体的研究。结论/讨论:虽然有一些文献支持对接受姑息治疗或临终关怀的患者进行亚急性到家庭过渡的针对性干预,但纳入的干预措施并未针对边缘化群体。需要在这些领域进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信