An Institutional and Ecological Analysis of the Healthcare Environment in Korea: Focus on Institutional Logics, Actors, and Governance structures

김수진, 권순만, 유명순
{"title":"An Institutional and Ecological Analysis of the Healthcare Environment in Korea: Focus on Institutional Logics, Actors, and Governance structures","authors":"김수진, 권순만, 유명순","doi":"10.4332/KJHPA.2011.21.3.457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"【The primary goal of our study was to investigate the vast transformations of the healthcare sector in Korea during the past half century. Official data reported in the Korean statistical yearbooks and secondary data suggested by previous studies were used for institutional analysis of healthcare environment. Information on hospital released by the Korean Hospital Association was also used for ecological analysis. Institutional analysis: We identified three distinctive eras based primarily on changes in institutional logics, institutional actors, and governance structures : 'professional dominance (1952-1976)', 'government involvement (1977-1999)', and 'coexistence of competing institutional logics (2000-present)'. During the first era, physician association supported by Korean government comprised the primary governance regime. During the second era, the government became a major actor as a regulator and purchaser in health care sector, introducing of the 'mandatory national health insurance'. During the third era, making healthcare system sustainable and providing health care efficiently was overarching goals although it was hard to find a single central logic dominating this period. Ecological analysis: Evidence from the analysis of hospital population suggested that the expansion of the bed capacity was made from different processes, shifting from the ecological process in 1980s to the adaptive process in 1990s. And Korean hospitals had changed following both 'directional process' and 'stabilizing process' over time. Based on our results, we concluded that more studies to compare more organizational populations other than hospitals and to empirically test the effects of institutional changes on organizational changes and vice-versa, need to be conducted.】","PeriodicalId":253456,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2011.21.3.457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

【The primary goal of our study was to investigate the vast transformations of the healthcare sector in Korea during the past half century. Official data reported in the Korean statistical yearbooks and secondary data suggested by previous studies were used for institutional analysis of healthcare environment. Information on hospital released by the Korean Hospital Association was also used for ecological analysis. Institutional analysis: We identified three distinctive eras based primarily on changes in institutional logics, institutional actors, and governance structures : 'professional dominance (1952-1976)', 'government involvement (1977-1999)', and 'coexistence of competing institutional logics (2000-present)'. During the first era, physician association supported by Korean government comprised the primary governance regime. During the second era, the government became a major actor as a regulator and purchaser in health care sector, introducing of the 'mandatory national health insurance'. During the third era, making healthcare system sustainable and providing health care efficiently was overarching goals although it was hard to find a single central logic dominating this period. Ecological analysis: Evidence from the analysis of hospital population suggested that the expansion of the bed capacity was made from different processes, shifting from the ecological process in 1980s to the adaptive process in 1990s. And Korean hospitals had changed following both 'directional process' and 'stabilizing process' over time. Based on our results, we concluded that more studies to compare more organizational populations other than hospitals and to empirically test the effects of institutional changes on organizational changes and vice-versa, need to be conducted.】
韩国医疗保健环境的制度和生态分析:关注制度逻辑、行为者和治理结构
【本研究的主要目的是调查过去半个世纪韩国医疗保健行业的巨大变革。】韩国统计年鉴中报告的官方数据和以往研究建议的二手数据用于医疗保健环境的制度分析。韩国医院协会公布的医院信息也被用于生态分析。制度分析:我们主要根据制度逻辑、制度参与者和治理结构的变化确定了三个不同的时代:“专业主导(1952-1976)”、“政府参与(1977-1999)”和“竞争制度逻辑共存(2000年至今)”。在第一个时代,韩国政府支持的医师协会构成了主要的治理体制。在第二个时代,政府成为医疗保健部门的主要参与者,作为监管者和购买者,引入了“强制性国民健康保险”。在第三个时代,使医疗保健系统可持续发展并有效地提供医疗保健是首要目标,尽管很难找到一个主导这一时期的中心逻辑。生态分析:从医院人口分析的证据来看,病床容量的扩张经历了不同的过程,从20世纪80年代的生态过程到90年代的适应过程。随着时间的推移,韩国医院的变化遵循了“定向过程”和“稳定过程”。根据我们的研究结果,我们得出结论,需要进行更多的研究,以比较医院以外的更多组织人群,并实证检验制度变革对组织变革的影响,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信