Reliability analysis of systems based on software and human resources

A. Pasquini, G. Pistolesi, A. Rizzo
{"title":"Reliability analysis of systems based on software and human resources","authors":"A. Pasquini, G. Pistolesi, A. Rizzo","doi":"10.1109/ISSRE.1997.630883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safety critical systems require an assessment activity to verify that they are able to perform their functions in specified use environments. This activity would benefit from evaluation methodologies that consider these systems as a whole and not as the simple sum of their parts. Indeed, analysis of accidents involving such systems has shown that they are rarely due to the simple failure of one of their components. Accidents are the outcome of a composite causal scenario where human, software and hardware failures combine in a complex pattern. On the contrary, dependability analysis and evaluation of safety critical systems are based on techniques and methodologies that concern human and computer separately, and whose results can hardly be integrated. The analogies between the processes of: (1) software reliability growth due to testing and the related fault removal; (2) improvement of man machine interface due to preliminary operative feedback; (3) improvement of the operator performances due to his learning activity; suggest an effort for a common evaluation approach. Only the first one of these processes is currently modelled by using mathematical methods. The paper considers extending these methods to study the reliability growth process of other system components, i.e. the operator and the man machine interface. To study the feasibility of the approach, the paper analyses the results of an experiment in which the reliability of a system is evaluated using trend analysis. The evaluation concerns the graphic man machine interface and the operators, and could easily be extended to the software control system.","PeriodicalId":170184,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings The Eighth International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings The Eighth International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.1997.630883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Safety critical systems require an assessment activity to verify that they are able to perform their functions in specified use environments. This activity would benefit from evaluation methodologies that consider these systems as a whole and not as the simple sum of their parts. Indeed, analysis of accidents involving such systems has shown that they are rarely due to the simple failure of one of their components. Accidents are the outcome of a composite causal scenario where human, software and hardware failures combine in a complex pattern. On the contrary, dependability analysis and evaluation of safety critical systems are based on techniques and methodologies that concern human and computer separately, and whose results can hardly be integrated. The analogies between the processes of: (1) software reliability growth due to testing and the related fault removal; (2) improvement of man machine interface due to preliminary operative feedback; (3) improvement of the operator performances due to his learning activity; suggest an effort for a common evaluation approach. Only the first one of these processes is currently modelled by using mathematical methods. The paper considers extending these methods to study the reliability growth process of other system components, i.e. the operator and the man machine interface. To study the feasibility of the approach, the paper analyses the results of an experiment in which the reliability of a system is evaluated using trend analysis. The evaluation concerns the graphic man machine interface and the operators, and could easily be extended to the software control system.
基于软件和人力资源的系统可靠性分析
安全关键系统需要评估活动来验证它们能够在特定的使用环境中执行其功能。这项活动将受益于将这些系统视为一个整体而不是其各部分的简单总和的评价方法。事实上,对涉及此类系统的事故的分析表明,它们很少是由于其中一个部件的简单故障造成的。事故是人为、软件和硬件故障以复杂模式结合在一起的复合因果场景的结果。相反,安全关键系统的可靠性分析和评价是基于人与计算机分开的技术和方法,其结果很难整合。(1)通过测试提高软件可靠性和排除故障;(2)初步操作反馈,改进人机界面;(3)操作员的学习活动提高了操作员的绩效;建议采用一种通用的评估方法。目前只有第一个过程是用数学方法建模的。本文考虑将这些方法扩展到研究其他系统组件(即操作员和人机界面)的可靠性增长过程。为了研究该方法的可行性,本文分析了用趋势分析法评估系统可靠性的实验结果。该评价涉及图形人机界面和操作人员,易于扩展到软件控制系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信