The Influence of Consumers’ Logical and Affective Brand Evaluation Inclinations on Consideration Set Composition

Fumiaki Kikuchi
{"title":"The Influence of Consumers’ Logical and Affective Brand Evaluation Inclinations on Consideration Set Composition","authors":"Fumiaki Kikuchi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2809490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores how consumers’ brand evaluation inclinations influence the degree of brand convergence in their consideration sets. We treated consumers’ brand evaluation inclinations two-dimensionally (logical and affective) and divided consumers into the following four groups: (I) strong logical and affective brand evaluation inclination, (II) weak logical and strong affective brand evaluation inclination, (III) weak logical and affective brand evaluation inclination, and (IV) strong logical and weak affective brand evaluation inclination. We hypothesized that the degree of convergence would differ among the four groups and assumed, more concretely, that it would be highest in Group IV, moderate in Group I and Group III, and lowest in Group II. A series of experiments based on data gathered via questionnaires showed differences in the degrees of brand convergence among the four groups, which supports this study’s primary hypothesis. However, the observed magnitude of the relationships differed from this study’s supposition. The empirical results showed that the degrees of convergence for consumers in Group II and Group III were higher than those for consumers in Group I and Group IV.","PeriodicalId":443127,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2809490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores how consumers’ brand evaluation inclinations influence the degree of brand convergence in their consideration sets. We treated consumers’ brand evaluation inclinations two-dimensionally (logical and affective) and divided consumers into the following four groups: (I) strong logical and affective brand evaluation inclination, (II) weak logical and strong affective brand evaluation inclination, (III) weak logical and affective brand evaluation inclination, and (IV) strong logical and weak affective brand evaluation inclination. We hypothesized that the degree of convergence would differ among the four groups and assumed, more concretely, that it would be highest in Group IV, moderate in Group I and Group III, and lowest in Group II. A series of experiments based on data gathered via questionnaires showed differences in the degrees of brand convergence among the four groups, which supports this study’s primary hypothesis. However, the observed magnitude of the relationships differed from this study’s supposition. The empirical results showed that the degrees of convergence for consumers in Group II and Group III were higher than those for consumers in Group I and Group IV.
消费者的逻辑与情感品牌评价倾向对考虑集构成的影响
本文探讨了消费者的品牌评价倾向如何影响其考虑集中的品牌趋同程度。我们对消费者的品牌评价倾向进行了二维(逻辑和情感)处理,并将消费者分为以下四组:(I)逻辑和情感强烈的品牌评价倾向,(II)逻辑和情感强烈的品牌评价倾向,(III)逻辑和情感弱的品牌评价倾向,(IV)逻辑和情感强烈的品牌评价倾向。我们假设四组之间的趋同程度不同,更具体地说,第四组趋同程度最高,第一组和第三组中等,第二组最低。通过问卷调查收集的数据进行的一系列实验表明,四组消费者的品牌趋同程度存在差异,这支持了本研究的主要假设。然而,观察到的关系大小与本研究的假设不同。实证结果表明,第二组和第三组消费者的趋同程度高于第一组和第四组消费者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信